Also, you are making a statement that no one actually said, implied, or hinted at...
My statements are my opinions and observations, much like yours.
Isn’t that the point of these discussions and forums? Also, I feel it’s at least relevant to this thread. Cheers.
I don't know what the "fundamentals taught in nursing school" would consist of, but if it's being evaluated via a test, the test should weed out those that don't know it... right? And couldn't an experienced paramedic learn on their own, enough to perform at the level of an entry level nurse?
I think you finally argued back your own (and my) point.
Very experienced paramedic here. I have the experience that
@ExpatMedic0 referred to, but all these years later I still know what I don’t know here. Guess what that is? The basics of nursing fundamentals.
I would not feel confident, nor comfortable sitting in on the NCLEX as of today. Maybe I am just not that smart, I’m ok with that.
Paramedicine in and of itself is a specialty, I think we can all agree and, in fact, have at one time or another made mention of this.
Nursing has a multitude of sub-specialties. My understanding of the NCLEX is that it can and will elude to all forms of nursing.
How is it fair to assume that a paramedic with a “specialized care” mentality should be prepared to learn the bones of nursing?
Conversely a nurse who’s never worked ER, ICU, as a flight or CCT RN, why should they be permitted to sit for the NREMT/P?
Maybe if there was a a test created to bridge the 2 specialities (EMS—> ER RN), but i think that that nullifies the whole point of nursing school.
I think it was already mentioned, but the nurses going after their EMT or paramedic are not nurses without requisite knowledge in emergency or critical care. There’s no exam to shortcut a paramedic to specialist nurse, I don’t see the big deal.
Anyway, no firsthand knowledge of the NCLEX as I have no immediate plans to sit for it. Just my thoughts.