Good evening all!
I work in California, where we have no RSI, but that is not the debate. Frequently I will have a Pt who you can predict is going to be getting an RSI upon arrival to the ER. To best prepare these patients, and to generally protect them the best I can, I will usually begin pre-oxygenating them en route if I think an RSI upon arrival is likely. Unfortunately I often find myself in situations where the receiving ED team doesn't know what I'm up to, and then ignores my reasoning.
An example from the other day. I had a 40's female Pt with MS, who was quadriplegic and in respiratory distress, with an SPO2 of 81% on 3 liters of home O2. My partner and I got her sat up to 95% after getting her onto our tanks, and by putting an NRB over her NC, which we cranked up to 10. Mildly unpleasant for the Pt's 10min ride to the ED, but her breathing improved massively. ED staff decided that they wanted to RSI, and promptly removed the NC and removed the NRB (so they could use the wall O2 source for a BVM) and laid the PT flat. Within a minute she as back at 83%, so they began bagging her (while stile supine) at about 20/min. SPO2 hit 85% and they went ahead with the RSI. Pt regurgitated her gastric contents upon introduction of the laryngoscope, which promptly filled the airway. Suctioning happened quickly, and the tube was in place shortly after with an SPO2 at 78%. This is one example, but quite illustrative of my problem.
I was taught hi-flow NC with NRB over the top for pre-oxygenation, and to leave the NC on during intubation. I was also taught that elevating the head of the bed 30-45* greatly reduces the likelihood of complications during intubation.
How can I better explain myself to my interdepartmental peers? It's somewhat disheartening when the whole room looks at you like you're the idiot while the evidence supports you.
I work in California, where we have no RSI, but that is not the debate. Frequently I will have a Pt who you can predict is going to be getting an RSI upon arrival to the ER. To best prepare these patients, and to generally protect them the best I can, I will usually begin pre-oxygenating them en route if I think an RSI upon arrival is likely. Unfortunately I often find myself in situations where the receiving ED team doesn't know what I'm up to, and then ignores my reasoning.
An example from the other day. I had a 40's female Pt with MS, who was quadriplegic and in respiratory distress, with an SPO2 of 81% on 3 liters of home O2. My partner and I got her sat up to 95% after getting her onto our tanks, and by putting an NRB over her NC, which we cranked up to 10. Mildly unpleasant for the Pt's 10min ride to the ED, but her breathing improved massively. ED staff decided that they wanted to RSI, and promptly removed the NC and removed the NRB (so they could use the wall O2 source for a BVM) and laid the PT flat. Within a minute she as back at 83%, so they began bagging her (while stile supine) at about 20/min. SPO2 hit 85% and they went ahead with the RSI. Pt regurgitated her gastric contents upon introduction of the laryngoscope, which promptly filled the airway. Suctioning happened quickly, and the tube was in place shortly after with an SPO2 at 78%. This is one example, but quite illustrative of my problem.
I was taught hi-flow NC with NRB over the top for pre-oxygenation, and to leave the NC on during intubation. I was also taught that elevating the head of the bed 30-45* greatly reduces the likelihood of complications during intubation.
How can I better explain myself to my interdepartmental peers? It's somewhat disheartening when the whole room looks at you like you're the idiot while the evidence supports you.