WuLabsWuTecH
Forum Deputy Chief
- 1,244
- 7
- 38
So I saw an article today (http://www.firehouse.com/news/11057508/cops-phoenix-ff-who-struck-killed-another-didnt-have-spotter) that mentioned the death of a firefighter caused by a backing accident.
Recently, one of my departments has a Chief who is on a warpath for making sure we use spotters while backing AT ALL TIMES. The only times we can choose not to use one is if (1. we are alone 2. There is no suitable person to serve as backer, or 3. Using a backer would adversely affect patient care.)
Now every department I've ever been on has had a backer policy, but usually its enforcement is very lax and for things that you do hundreds of times (backing out of a place at the hospital, backing into the station, backing out of that unfortunate placing of the diesel pump at the gas station) no one says anything or cares if you don't have a backer. But this particular chief has decided to be very strict (and I can't say I blame him).
I was curious as to how strict your own departments are in enforcing backing policies. A lot of people on my department thought that this reminder of the policy was just going to be a gentle nudge and didn't take it seriously (and why would they expect different when the policy has been there for decades but never enforced?), pissed off our chief, and now our chief comes out of his office to make sure there's backer every time he hears a backup alarm!
Obviously the best thing to do is to avoid positioning your vehicle such that backing is necessary, but there are times where you don't have that luxury!
(Though this is a news article that sparked me to ask the question, I believe that it fits here better than in news since my question is in relation to a topic and not the news article in itself. Mods please move this if you feel my judgment here was wrong)
Recently, one of my departments has a Chief who is on a warpath for making sure we use spotters while backing AT ALL TIMES. The only times we can choose not to use one is if (1. we are alone 2. There is no suitable person to serve as backer, or 3. Using a backer would adversely affect patient care.)
Now every department I've ever been on has had a backer policy, but usually its enforcement is very lax and for things that you do hundreds of times (backing out of a place at the hospital, backing into the station, backing out of that unfortunate placing of the diesel pump at the gas station) no one says anything or cares if you don't have a backer. But this particular chief has decided to be very strict (and I can't say I blame him).
I was curious as to how strict your own departments are in enforcing backing policies. A lot of people on my department thought that this reminder of the policy was just going to be a gentle nudge and didn't take it seriously (and why would they expect different when the policy has been there for decades but never enforced?), pissed off our chief, and now our chief comes out of his office to make sure there's backer every time he hears a backup alarm!
Obviously the best thing to do is to avoid positioning your vehicle such that backing is necessary, but there are times where you don't have that luxury!
(Though this is a news article that sparked me to ask the question, I believe that it fits here better than in news since my question is in relation to a topic and not the news article in itself. Mods please move this if you feel my judgment here was wrong)