- 8,009
- 58
- 48
OK... I know NJ is a Nanny State (19 to buy Tobacco?)You cannot be 19 and drive an ambulance in the state of NJ.
Can you explain why a 19 year old couldn't drive a rig?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
OK... I know NJ is a Nanny State (19 to buy Tobacco?)You cannot be 19 and drive an ambulance in the state of NJ.
OK... I know NJ is a Nanny State (19 to buy Tobacco?)
Can you explain why a 19 year old couldn't drive a rig?
Never heard that before. I worked with several 18 year olds who drive....
OK... I know NJ is a Nanny State (19 to buy Tobacco?)
Can you explain why a 19 year old couldn't drive a rig?
There is no minimum age to operate any emergency vehicle in the State of NJ. Insane...yes...but that's the way it is....
But also don't group all volunteer agencies as one or two call a day places. My parent's town gets about 5000 EMS calls a year (give or take a few hundred). one squad covers the town. nights and weekends are all volunteer, with the occasional day crew. how many of your EMS agencies can say the same? And before anyone asks, I wish they would put on paid staff 24/7 and bill instead of having to beg for donations.
more larger paid agencies, fewer slow volunteer agencies, equal training standards for all, fewer town boundaries restricting emergency services, closest unit goes, yeah, a man can dream.
I find that offensive. I'm 19. I drive very carefully. I have seen more people in the an older age group drive much worse than someone who is 19.You're going to get a lot of 19-year-old EMTs who want to drive an ambulance like they stole it.
And on the note that many people think volunteer agencies have poor patient care - I have shown up on many scenes where a pt really should have gone to a hospital but refuses because they think they will be billed for the ambulance transport.
Also I have seen much poorer patient care come from paid medical staff rather than a volunteer agency. Such as my local ER staff and many of the medics we get. the medics have left scenes where they were needed because the "patient is faking" without even doing an assessment. the medics have given out expired medication, and have been fined for it. (will they change? considering the company, probably not)
the local er staff (and medics) hardly ever uses gloves when touching a patient, which in my opinion is a simple, but crucial thing to patient care to avoid cross contamination. If someone just touched a patient with mrsa and then touched me, I would not be a happy camper.
a paycheck means crap in terms of quality of care.
the local er staff (and medics) hardly ever uses gloves when touching a patient, which in my opinion is a simple, but crucial thing to patient care to avoid cross contamination.
This is gonna turn into a paid vs volly debate, isn't it? This is the bottom line for me:
If we are going to forward EMS as a profession, and expect better pay and treatment from employers, we need to get rid of working for free. In NO other profession, are people working for free. Why would an employer pay more for someone to work for them, when they can just get someone for free? Allowing people to work for free just makes this job a joke. Also, the cost for getting the 'education' required for EMT or Medic is WAY too cheap! Why do I say this? If we have to all pay 15-20k for our medic education, would you be inclined to do it for free? But if you think it looks cool, and a volly squad will pay for your basic if you work with them, why would you ever want to go paid? It's stupid.
Err. Do you know what universal precautions is?
Ok, then. What does universal precautions say about intact skin and sweat?Yes, I do. Not every one seems to use them.
Ok, then. What does universal precautions say about intact skin and sweat?
Close enough. So, what again, is the problem with tending to patients without gloves again?
Close enough. So, what again, is the problem with tending to patients without gloves again?