Hey all,
I'm going to throw in my few words now, since I don't necessarily get a lot of time online considering I'm overseas at the moment. (Which I'm trying to turn into a good opportunity to knock out a lot of Gen Ed requirements towards a potential BSN, so any advice via PM from Vent, Rid, etc is never unappreciated.)
Anyways, I see this broken down into a few main points:
1) Young providers vs experience
- 18 years old, graduate of High School to begin schooling. It's the same as any other profession. Whether volunteer or paid, there is no reason to have providers still in High School. Now, this is the fact that im still young and completely irresponsible, but in High School I knew I wanted to get involved with EMS when I graduated and experience it first hand. Of course, when I was in High School I was busy with keeping my grades decent, swimming, going out with friends, the stupid things you get away with(drinking, sneaking out, etc). There's no reason to push yourself to grow up to fast, experience it when you have the chance.
2) Observers, young or old
- Observers don't have a place unless they serve an actual purpose. Students are OK, but not if they're only there to "help out". If I need help I'll call for assistance, or recruit a FF or LEO. I do a fair number of ALS intercepts when I'm stateside with Ambulance Corps that have a clown car full, and it always seems as if there are multiple 15 and 16 year olds. It aggravates the hell out of me sometimes, just because I need to work around them. And I can't even teach them too much, because most of them don't have any foundation for the knowledge. You can't very well explain any cardiac issues without any anatomy and physiology training.
3) Vollie vs Paid
- First of all, I'm in NY, and have worked CT and PA. The systems I've seen are BS. I want to see call statistics from any vollie departments that states that they provide effective care in comparison to a paid department. First the tones drop for a BLS squad and they dispatch ALS if necessary. Then all their members decide if it's an exciting call and if they should respond. Otherwise, they can just let the county tone out for another squad. And hell to the Paramedic who is sitting on scene in a fly car. And if it's dispatched BLS it will take a long time for a unit to get on scene and recognize the need for an ALS unit to the scene. The amount of time for the patient to receive what should be the minimal standard of care is completely crazy. When you had a paid service, at least the ambulance gets out the door and en route to the residence in a reasonable amount of time. And I know "but my department ALWAYS crews up." BULL:censored::censored::censored::censored:. In order to be effective you should probably have a standard to uphold. Something like 90% of calls we will be en route within 2 minutes, on-scene within x minutes, en route to the hospital within x minutes(for those of you that utilize the BLS fly car system).
I have no problem working with volunteers that act professionally, and provide something to their community(like making it to the scene before the ALS unit). I should not have to worry about getting in trouble because I was on scene and began transport to the hospital and upset the BLS crew because I didn't wait for them. If you say your community can't support a paid system, look larger, go to the county level. Do something. Advocating more resources to go to an ineffectual volunteer department doesn't solve anything.
Obviously the usual arguments apply:
-BLS education standards need to be raised
-A&P for everyone
-ALS education standards to be raised