ERDoc
Forum Asst. Chief
- 546
- 616
- 93
Aside from that, I feel like especially in an urban environment, and working in an ED where I can see the other side of the coin, I don't see the need for aggressive pain management with 10-15 minute transports. Likely by the time the med actually starts making a difference, you're pretty close to the hospital and giving things pre-hospitally messes up the ED "flow" if you will. For example, we do not give narcotics in the ED unless you are either getting admitted or have a ride home. If you are driving home, no candy for you. Most medics don't really think about that. Also, having the advantage of seeing a lot of our patient's EMR, you feel a lot more jaded when you see someone with 10/10 pain acute onset lower back pain, but they've been at the ED every month and have had 30 of hydrocodone filled a week ago.

Where do I even begin? Why should anyone have to suffer any longer than they have to? Paperwork is no excuse. You are being paid to take care of people and that is what you do. Paperwork is just part of the job. Yeah, you may be at the hospital in 10-15 minutes but it is going to be at least another 30 minutes before they get any meds in the ER. Do you want to suffer with a fractured hip for over 1 hour, when you could have been treated earlier? That is just cruel. Giving things in the field DOES NOT mess up any flow in the ER. There are plenty of people that get sent home that benefit from narcs (kidney stones, fractures, dislocations, DVTs, biliary colic, bad lacerations, pyelo, etc). Why would you not treat these people? Yes, driving home is a concern but that is not something EMS should be worrying about. We all have our frequent fliers and we know who they are. With experience, it becomes somewhat easier to identify who does and does not need narcotic pain meds. Always remember that even the frequent fliers actually get sick sometimes.