- 4,995
- 1,385
- 113
I suspect descent rate policy is directly due to avoiding VRS.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes sir. VRS or settling with power. My company just hired a clinician (quit previous company) who was involved in a VRS incident that was recorded not too long ago.I suspect descent rate policy is directly due to avoiding VRS.
Pretty much what Desert said. Landing into the wind and then pedal turn to orient the aircraft in the desired direction to keep the tail rotor out of the way.
Helicopters operate differently when close to the ground. Pilots are good at knowing how to fly in various situations
Sounds like you might be describing a fenestron
That is a EC145/H145.I'm familiar with landing into a headwind, taking off into tailwind. (Tangent, not proof I know diddly squat about rotary wing aircraft)I was given the yoke of an experimental gyrocopter once. That was cool.
Actually, got a picture of the helo. Didn't really look at it and there was a tree in the way most of the time. I guess it's decent enough to use for identication.
Wait. I'm an idiot. I should have checked the local squawk app for what aircraft were birds were in the air. Too late.
RW typically lands and takes off into the wind. It provides the most lift while using the least power in both situations. Landing into the wind as I understand it, also removes the vortex ring from the equation.I'm familiar with landing into a headwind, taking off into tailwind. (Tangent, not proof I know diddly squat about rotary wing aircraft)I was given the yoke of an experimental gyrocopter once. That was cool.
Actually, got a picture of the helo. Didn't really look at it and there was a tree in the way most of the time. I guess it's decent enough to use for identication.
Wait. I'm an idiot. I should have checked the local squawk app for what aircraft were birds were in the air. Too late.
RW typically lands and takes off into the wind. It provides the most lift while using the least power in both situations. Landing into the wind as I understand it, also removes the vortex ring from the equation.
Truthfully, I'm not an aviation buff. I just work in a helicopter and try my best everyday to look like I know what im doing.Hmm, well for fixed wings is true though, right?
I always crashed the RC helicopter [emoji28]
Truthfully, I'm not an aviation buff. I just work in a helicopter and try my best everyday to look like I know what im doing.
No. Beyond weather going south or a fuel pump failure in flight that we turned around for, no major mechanical issues or IIMC.Ever had any major aviation failure or disaster? Declare an in flight emergency?
Didn’t even hear about it. The way it was spinning makes it look like a tail rotor issue.Since were on the subject anyone else see the video of the Mesa Crash the other day?
My first thoughts also. I saw some facebook comments that the tail rotor went through the roof of a building about a mile from the crash site.Didn’t even hear about it. The way it was spinning makes it look like a tail rotor issue.
My first thoughts also. I saw some facebook comments that the tail rotor went through the roof of a building about a mile from the crash site.
I think the term is pretty damn fast. Depending on the helicopter the tail rotor spins 3-7 times faster than the main rotor.What's the RPM/ velocity of a tail rotor?
I think the term is pretty damn fast.
My first thoughts also. I saw some facebook comments that the tail rotor went through the roof of a building about a mile from the crash site.