Similar to the MCAT, USMLE, etc I wonder why there are not dozens of practice exams in the exact format of the NREMT exam. Even old, retired exams. Ideas why?
Because the exam alike similar medical examinations are copyrighted and anything similar that was tested before could ensure copyright problems.
Institutions that fail to write test such as using the stem key type questions and detractors, those similar to the NREMT format is not doing their students justice.
As an educator, I was taught how to write tests similar to the NREMT format. As an educator; I also discuss with students immediately after tests the format used, emphasis placed on questions. This allows me to increase writing tests in the curriculum similar to the NREMT format, as well all tests are administered per computer so students are familiar with the same type of usage.
What I have found is many instructors are
NOT educators nor have any education level background in test writing at a professional level. Many attempt to use simplistic usage, and or field experience and or direct medical protocol (which Board Examinations will never use).
The NREMT is unique that the pass rates are much higher in comparison to other medical and board examinations. What I have found is most students in EMS have poor study habits and demonstrate high test anxiety. When examined it rare to see EMS students to study more than 2-4 hours per day, and as the original poster described (and others) many do not even study, yet complain of the test and how it is written. Was it the test or the applicant? Many or instructors fail to schedule test review within the course itself. EMS is a unique profession that promotes "teamwork and partners" but when in the classroom, verily rarely promotes the usage of study groups and different type of reviews.
Personally, I had thought of developing classes/courses similar to the NCLEX review. What I have found in those type of courses are test taking hints and core review, rather than just specific review questions. Of course review questions are definitely needed to ensure and review areas of weakness, and again re-enforce questions similar to the examination.
I realize as an educator, no matter how well the student performs in class, or may demonstrate to be the next Johnny Gage without passing the board certification or license will be useless. We also need to remember that the certification examinations only tests over the
minimal allowable standards, and course content has to be more introduced than just is what tested over.
R/r 911