The Possum
Forum Crew Member
- 41
- 7
- 8
CDC webpage.Source?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
CDC webpage.Source?
Uhhhh, that is 100% false information. I have an allergy to amoxicillin and received the Pfizer shot with no issues.Some people cannot do these vaccines. People who are allergic to penicillin or amoxicillin like my wife. Those ingredients are inside these shots for Covid 19. I'm sure that companies mandating workers to get shots would be something that could definitely be challenged in the court of law. I did get the shot because my work site was strongly recommending it and they gave it to us for free. I took Pfizer and have not had any reactions.
I just checked the CDC website and didn't see any recommendation against getting vaccinated for people with penicillin allergies. Under the section headed "If You Have Allergies Not Related to Vaccines," it says, "CDC recommends that people get vaccinated even if they have a history of severe allergic reactions to injectable medications...People with a history of allergies to oral medications or a family history of severe allergic reactions may also get vaccinated."CDC webpage.
they could challenge, it, but they would likely lose. there is legal precedent for this, and cases have already been tossed.I'm sure that companies mandating workers to get shots would be something that could definitely be challenged in the court of law.
they could challenge, it, but they would likely lose. there is legal precedent for this, and cases have already been tossed.
Except that precedent has effectively been established in this case already when the judge tossed the lawsuit.There is legal precedent for requiring approved vaccines, not EUA. EUA vaccines have never before been distributed at a scale worth challenging, so as it stands it is merely presumed precedence.
It was tossed on a conspiracy theorist argument, that doesn't set precedent.Except that precedent has effectively been established in this case already when the judge tossed the lawsuit.
I said effectively a precedent. It's going to make it that much harder when the next case is filed.It was tossed on a conspiracy theorist argument, that doesn't set precedent.
They had some wild arguments but those weren't the only merits argued. It lost hard period.It was tossed on a conspiracy theorist argument, that doesn't set precedent.
For the future, that's not a "source" if you don't include an actual link. We aren't going to go search for the validity of your claim, please provide us with a direct reference.CDC webpage.
Look at what CA announced today...mandatory vaccines for ALL state employees and healthcare workers. If you choose to not be vaccinated, you will be subjected to frequent testing.
idk... that's a question for your employer. however, if that is the condition they say of not getting the vaccine, I would make sure it was in my calendar where and when I was going to get my test from, and never miss an appointment.I’ve held out getting the vaccine but kinda knew at some point it was going to get to this. All this hypocrisy and flip flop decision making it’s hard not to second guess anyone at this point. Now I’m forced to get the jab or lose my job. Getting tested twice a week isn’t realistic. If I missed one test what happens? Do I get shown the door?
Flip flop decision making could also be called rolling with the punches. Science is uncertain, and sometimes it’s better to pivot the guidance rather than just ride something out.I’ve held out getting the vaccine but kinda knew at some point it was going to get to this. All this hypocrisy and flip flop decision making it’s hard not to second guess anyone at this point. Now I’m forced to get the jab or lose my job. Getting tested twice a week isn’t realistic. If I missed one test what happens? Do I get shown the door?
Seems pretty simple to me. You have the right not to get vaccinated. Companies have the right not to employ you.I’ve held out getting the vaccine but kinda knew at some point it was going to get to this. All this hypocrisy and flip flop decision making it’s hard not to second guess anyone at this point. Now I’m forced to get the jab or lose my job. Getting tested twice a week isn’t realistic. If I missed one test what happens? Do I get shown the door?
Which I think is fair and reasonable, especially when balanced against mandatory vaccination, which my position on is well known.Look at what CA announced today...mandatory vaccines for ALL state employees and healthcare workers. If you choose to not be vaccinated, you will be subjected to frequent testing.
Sounds like your in a pickle, I would opt for the jab brother, sound like a pain in the *** to deal with testing and so forth. We just admitted a few patients for ECMO due to unvaccinated COVID. Would hate to see you with rectal tube, foley, dobhoff FT, OG, Cordis, Central lines, PRONED, paralyzed (ever heard of Nimbex?), sedated, on pressors. true storyI’ve held out getting the vaccine but kinda knew at some point it was going to get to this. All this hypocrisy and flip flop decision making it’s hard not to second guess anyone at this point. Now I’m forced to get the jab or lose my job. Getting tested twice a week isn’t realistic. If I missed one test what happens? Do I get shown the
I worked at a hospital where my glucose was LITERALLY 2 points above Their own hospital "normal" range and i was considered unhealthy and given a writeup for it IN ORIENTATION. Stupid, yes."Litany of compelling rationale for an employer to try and protect the employee"
And the road to Hell is paved in good intentions.
Where do you draw the line? May an employer require you be a non-smoking, non-drinking, 4 day a week exercising, body fat percentage of less than 2%, genetically screened for minimal risks to cancer? All of these things carry risks to employer staffing availability, and all have been viewed as "the greatest threat" to a person's health at one time or another.