- 8,009
- 58
- 48
folks... I've merged the 2 threads on the "Junior Member" discussion, just so that we don't have to repeat ourselves, as they are both active right now.
Jon
EMTLife CL
Jon
EMTLife CL
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So I guess I'm confused as to what you guys (Rid, Flight-LP...) are saying. Maybe some of you have had bad experience with younger EMT's?? That's fine, but you can't stereotype everyone by their age. Heck, there are 30 year olds that can't make decisions under pressure. Age is just a number and by no means defines how competent a person is. It can provide a guideline for such, but it must be taken on a situation specific basis. Yes, I agree there are many people in EMS that shouldn't be, but the fact is that they are there because they passed a test and someone felt they were qualified to provide care for others.
I just can't understand why age is such a big issue.... Please feel free to elaborate, but play nice...
We hire experienced, mature, and career minded EMT's, children need not apply............................
Besides, Texas was smart enough to regulate that all EMT's will be over the age of 18!
How is one supposed to get experience if no one will hire without experience? If one can say that he/she is familiar with some aspects of patient care through volunteering/observing at an ER or an ambo, I would be much more likely to choose that person over some guy who just completed his EMT course.
So is Arizona. I am 19. What is the exact "age of responsibility"? When does one stop being referred to as a "child" and start being called an adult??? No matter what your opinion is, again, you can't assume that stereotype applies to all people that age. If people were more open minded about younger people, I might have a job by now. Frankly, I think the hiring manager(s) sees "Birthday: 5/3/89" and throws the application out before reading anymore. Unfortunately there's nothing I can do because (to my knowledge) employer's are able to discriminate by age.
Sorry, observers are just voyeurs.
Dictionary.com said:vo·yeur
a person who engages in voyeurism.
Compare Peeping Tom.
Dictionary.com said:vo·yeur·ism
–noun the practice of obtaining sexual gratification by looking at sexual objects or acts, esp. secretively.
Watching is not experience, you can do that on youtube! Gain experience working interfacility transfers for a private company. Become proficient in assessing patients, obtaining vitals, writing documentation, and interpersonal communication / interaction. Or better yet, go to Paramedic school. Gain a valuable education in the process................
Sorry. It's a word you don't see all the time, so I had to look it up.
Also on the dictionary.com website.1. A person who derives sexual gratification from observing the naked bodies or sexual acts of others, especially from a secret vantage point.
2. An obsessive observer of sordid or sensational subjects.
-American Heritage Dictionary
Also on the dictionary.com website.
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?r=2&q=voyeurism
Really? I guess we can throw out medical school because there are medical students who are in the hospital to observe. There was a whole division of paramedic program set to "observe" medics in the ambulance and nurses and MDs in the hospital. There seems to be alot of observing going on in the medic profession.This is a profession, not a baby sitting organization. If you do not perform care, and just there to watch, go to the movies. I do not have time, nor should I have to have the responsibility to watch you, partner, and then the patient as well.
This nonsense. EMT classes here are filled with 17 and 18 year olds. The EMT-B profession pays $10/hr. The only people who fill this position are 18 to 25.This is why EMT courses in high school is declining. As well, most EMS services do not want riders, voyeurs on the ambulance.
Volunteers are not allowed to perform procedures for insurance. Not for privacy reasons. Volunteers do in fact watch becuase what there asked to do puts them in patient areas. Some volunteer programs have volunteers following doctors, PA are other professionals. Voluneers work in the ER. Its a fact.Sorry, I do NOT see volunteers in ER performing or even watching procedures.. it's called patient privacy for a reason.
I have doen research. Thank you.Want more information, I suggest googling National EMS Educators Association, JEMS, Psychology for Health Care Educators, etc. Do a lit research..
Are we talking about people under 18 or just threats to anyone in EMS? PTSD is aproblem for all EMS personnel, Cops, fireifighters, Doctors, nurses and just about everyone who does anything in the real world. PTSD doesn't just attack EMS workers or teenagers on a call.Obviously, you have never seen or dealt with those in EMS that suffer PTSD. I have and still do, it is not pretty and it is devastating to those that have it. Even the strong, older medics that have experience can suffer it.
Lack personal life history? I am sorry but "youths" are exposed to things that cause PTSD outside of EMS all the time.Now, let's reclarify that it more prominent to those that are younger and lack personal life history. So why, would a medical community want to even endanger or expose to youth to a possible problem? Has it happened? How many times.. whom knows? I know of at least two, and that is too many. Who is going to be responsible?
Actually we do represent an educational institution. Youth corp are put into CPR classes, PPE classes and required to become familiar with all the equipment on an ambulance. The medics actually love to have youth corp members. The youth corp members actually have a desire to learn unlike many of their adult EMT-B counterparts.Since you do not really represent an educational institution, patient privacy should be concern. Do the medics ask prior to observing if it is okay with them? Do they even have an option?
p.s : You ask how many"real patient interaction" I have encountered?
R/r 911
Bad distinction. One category (health care students) are getting experience that is directly relevant to their current education. Pre-meds are not in a medical degree program, and as such, do not fit into this category. The reality, though, is that the participation of volunteers is determined not only by the setup of the program, but also by the volunteers themselves. This is why, even in the same program, one volunteer can be involved in patient care while another is stuck restocking the supply cart.Really? I guess we can throw out medical school because there are medical students who are in the hospital to observe. There was a whole division of paramedic program set to "observe" medics in the ambulance and nurses and MDs in the hospital. There seems to be alot of observing going on in the medic profession.
Supply>demand=low wages. Low barrier to entry (110 hours)=low wages. The company I worked for (in So. Cal.) had plenty of people in the >25y/o category and the crews I see parked outside of the local dialysis clinic in Boston seem to have an even higher percentage of >25y/o working for them.This nonsense. EMT classes here are filled with 17 and 18 year olds. The EMT-B profession pays $10/hr. The only people who fill this position are 18 to 25.
"Other stuff happens" is a poor argument. It would be like saying, "Don't worry about this toxin, after all the kids are probably exposed to lead paint anyways." Just because "other stuff happens" doesn't mean we shouldn't work to reduce "stuff" in addition to "other stuff."Lack personal life history? I am sorry but "youths" are exposed to things that cause PTSD outside of EMS all the time.
The program I was a part of in college was geared solely to pre-healthcare students (nursing, med, allied health, etc) and was separate from the hospital auxiliary (mostly seniors and ran things like the book cart, information, gift store, etc). During the 6 months that I was in the ER, I essentially acted as an ER tech except I couldn't do 12 leads (the techs don't start IVs and the volunteers couldn't do 12 leads because it goes into the patient's chart). For example, some of the things I did was hook patient's up to monitors, transport lab specimens, patient transport (including solo if the patient didn't need to be monitored), CPR, assist with procedures (foley caths, got to watch a LP in case the doctor's phone rang [sterile procedure]), and restocking. In general, if it wasn't a situation where it was a 'more the merrier' (cardioversions, for example), yes permission was obtained (ex, watching an endoscopy for example). Of course the amount of 'action' that the volunteer was involved with almost completely depended on the level of self motivation of the volunteer and how well the volunteer got along with the ER staff.I know of NO hospital in my area that allows any volunteers (most are above the age of 70 anyway) to participate in patient care.. as what? If they have no license or formal training, again I ask what are they really going to do? Do you as well ask each patient before they enter if it is okay to be "observed during treatment"?
R/r 911
Youth corp members. Get training. Observe ambulance operations and begin participation based on the individual's ability to perform. Hundred of high school students have gone through the program. Not one case of PTSD. No it doesn't demean EMS to have a training ground for high school students. This program will gladly continue to produce students going into the health care and public service areas.
Hospitals have training programs for pre health high school and college students. So do local cops and firefighters.
I have an econ degree. $10 is the local pay for EMT-Bs doing interfacility transfers. There aren't enough EMT-Bs available either. There are always job openings. It doesn't appear there is an overabundant number of EMT's going round.
18 is legal age in the United States.