FiremanMike
Just a dude
- 1,201
- 763
- 113
US just jumped mortality by 100.
Intensive care specialist Hugh Montgomery: The average flu is about 1.3 to 1.4 contagious. that is in a community each person who contracts it will pass it on to 1.3 to 1.4 people on average. So 10 generations of transmission causes about 20 infections. 1 > 1.4 > 1.96 > 2.74 > 3.84 > 5.37 > 7.52 > 10.54 > 14.75 > 20.66
Covid-19 is much more contagious. In the community each person will pass it on to 3 people. So 10 generations of transmission can cause about 59,000 infections. 1 > 3 > 9 > 27 > 81 > 243 > 729 > 2187 > 6561 > 19683 > 59094
Maybe, but if that infection rate was accurate, don't you think our worldwide infection rate would be significantly higher? China alone, with 1.386 billion people, didn't lock down the country until 3 months after the virus was identified, yet they still only report 81,000 cases to the WHO as of yesterday morning.
Sure, but the flu season is a bit more spread out don't you think?
Everything sucks right now frankly. I rarely dislike going to work, but I don't like being here now. Will all of the attempts to slow this matter? I doubt we'll ever know.
The flu season is said to be 6 months, we're now at about 4 months into COVID.. while it's possible that we jump from 300,000 to 35m+ (will have to look at worldwide flu stats at some point to be fair), it seems unlikely.
Add those stats the Covid-19. While you are at it, could you include motor vehicle accidents?
BTW, mortality for the common (seasonal) flu is .1% Present Covid-19 mortality 4.1+%
Let's use your stats, 2018-2019: 34,200 / 35.5m infected * 100 = .096 deaths per 100 infections in the US. Average world wide is about the same.
Covid-19: 16567 / 382612 * 100 = 4.32 deaths per 100 infections (March 23 numbers)
The difference is, seasonal flu is multiple source in the wild. Covid-19 is single source. Consider Covid-19 with a few hundred thousand sources like the common flu, like we have right now. Consider how naive that comparison is.
Why would I look at auto accidents? I'm striking debate over our response to infectious diseases. I think there's evidence to show the flu is just as virulent and deadly, but for some reason we don't have this worldwide panic every year for the flu.
The bottom line is we'll likely NEVER know how many worldwide infectious there are of COVID, but what we can compare is the patients who are tested which has been, for the most part, the patients who are really sick with symptoms..
Flu - patients who are hospitalized, 2019 - 6.9% mortality, 2018 - 7.6% mortality, 2017 - 7.7% mortality, 2016 - 8.2% mortality
It's my understanding that confirmed cases reported by the WHO are ones with positive test results back, not those who simply are assumed based on screening. Speaking for my area, which is likely similar to the rest of the world, the only patients who have had testing completed and returned are the ones who are severely ill.
Worldwide COVID - 332,930 cases, 14,510 deaths = 4.4% mortality rate (which includes countries with poor access to healthcare).
Now, whether or not the confirmed cases is a fair comparison to the number of folks who are hospitalized with the flu is unclear. But that number of 332,930 worldwide cases seems shockingly low to me given how virulent covid is reported to be.
MY OPINION - there's really only two realities to the above number.. First, it really is as virulent (or more) as the the flu, and there are actually tens if not hundreds of millions of people worldwide already infected, meaning the mortality rate is dramatically lower than is being reported. The other possibility is that the mortality rate is high, but the infection rate is significantly lower than what they led on.
At this point, I lean more towards my first conclusion, but who knows.
Last edited: