ERDoc
Forum Asst. Chief
- 546
- 616
- 93
I've seen 12-leads that had leads that looked like VT when a pt was shaking their arm or leg. I can't recall if it showed up in any of the precordial leads, which is what an AED would be looking at.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The difference between someone having an MI and someone complaining of chest pain is vast. Requiring every STEMI to have pads placed is overkill, but far better than blindly placing them on someone who utters the magic words "chest pain."My local protocol is to place pads on conscious STEMI patient. That being said, the monitor doesn't go into AED mode unless the patient codes.
I have yet to see an EMS monitor that switches to AED mode all by itself. There's monitor mode and there's AED/Defib mode. Some monitors even have "Pace" mode. Even the AED monitors have to specifically put into AED mode before they'll do anything other than show a rhythm.My local protocol is to place pads on conscious STEMI patient. That being said, the monitor doesn't go into AED mode unless the patient codes.
I have yet to see an EMS monitor that switches to AED mode all by itself. There's monitor mode and there's AED/Defib mode. Some monitors even have "Pace" mode. Even the AED monitors have to specifically put into AED mode before they'll do anything other than show a rhythm.
My local protocol is to place pads on conscious STEMI patient. That being said, the monitor doesn't go into AED mode unless the patient codes.
Whats the justification to applying pads to every STEMI pt? Not every STEMI codes in the field or in the hospital for that matter. Seems like a waste to me.
Not every STEMI patient codes, but those go into vfib arrest benefit from immediate defibrillation. Not exactly the same thing, but I would compare it somewhat to leaving the pads on after ROSC (i.e. in case the patient codes again).
True, but what is the percentage of STEMI pt's that go into vfib during the time you have pt care? I'm not trying to argue, protocols are protocols. It just seems like a unnecessary protocol in my opinion.
Leaving the pads on after ROSC is different that placing them on an active STEMI. After all you did just shock the heart back into a rhythm, chances are fairly decent that the pt may code again. No guarantee that a STEMI will code on you during the duration of the call.
Just out of curiosity, how have the results been?Over the last year I transported 5 STEMIs, 2 of them arrested. Pads may be expensive, but charging that LP and firing off the shock in just a couple of seconds... Priceless.
Just out of curiosity, how have the results been?
I believe the system in this scenario is BLS first response, with transporting dual medics.Not sure exactly how your system works, but if a person is getting nitro/ASA and has chest pain and has a low SPO2, there should probably be a paramedic (or at least a request for one) involved in the story somewhere. They can determine whether the conscious cardiac patient requires therapy pads applied or not.
That's reasonable. I'd rather have the BLS do the other regular BLS stuff in that scenario though and have a good report ready for whenever they do get ALS, and then the medics can decide whether to put the pads on or not if they need to provide some sort of electrical therapy.I believe the system in this scenario is BLS first response, with transporting dual medics.
I believe the system in this scenario is BLS first response, with transporting dual medics.