If you've got the drugs and your patient is in pain, USE THE DRUGS.
This!
Especially if you have Fent, double Especially if you can give it Up the nose.
Though during a recent state truck inspection I was informed by the inspector that pain meds were optional and all the trucks in my fair Capitol city were without...
Back to topic: I start locks regularly and give fluid about 1% of the time. I generally take bloods 99% of the time or more. Chest pain gets a line and bloods, abdo pain gets the same, as well as AMS, diabetics and all unknown unconsciousnesses. Though that's not the whole list. If we feel it's warranted well even bring in a green tube on ice for a VBG or a grey top for a lactic.
Always before analgesics or benzos incase they want a Tox screen.
Were also pretty lucky, we use these fancy "BD Nexiva" catheter systems an they're pretty much set up to draw bloods instantly.
Who are we to determine who has real pain and who's pretending for meds? The fun thing about pain is that there's no real test for it and everyone's threshold is different.
Heck, if we DO think they're faking the pain, what's terribly wrong with finding out if the Abdo hurts more or the 18g?
Like it was said earlier, we should be looking further down the line, clinically, for our Pts. If we think this pt might need that line for SOME reason in the next 2 to 96 hours (depending on your hospital's inclination to change the line) why withhold it?
If vascular access is mentioned in prehospital standing orders and The scenario fits the orders, why would you withhold it? (The "Follow your local protocols" argument)
Lastly, Practice Makes Perfect. Coming up with reasons to not start a line generally means that you could come up with reasons why you could of. The more you do, the better you will be for when someone really is circling the drain and you need to kick it into high gear.
P. S. I am for IV access.