Ultimate Rescue Rick POV

bstone

Forum Deputy Chief
Messages
2,066
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Came across this on youtube. I think this wins the Ultimate Rescue Rick prize.

[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i-1O_3rl1rU&feature=related[/YOUTUBE]
 
If I see something like that in my rear view mirror (especially if I'm blinded by it!) I ain't gonna budge; let the SOB fly over me if it wants!
 
How did they get a video of my truck?! :rofl:

When I get more money I am probably going to buy stone lights for my truck. HOWEVER they will not be used for responses or anything of the sort. More of a show feature for when I go dirtbike riding.
 
If I see something like that in my rear view mirror (especially if I'm blinded by it!) I ain't gonna budge; let the SOB fly over me if it wants!

I will never understand this. You'll pull over for this individual while he is in the ambulance or fire truck he is going to get, but not while he is on the way there? Why delay him?
 
I'm not a huge fan of POV responses, but if the county/state laws support it get out of their way, especially coming from an EMS background. Stupid drivers not yielding are just as dangerous as ricky rescue running hot. Well maybe not JUST as dangerous but still dangerous. Do us all a favor and make his job/volly job easier and pull to the right.

FWIW personally thats a sick light setup, would I ever drop the coin on one for myself no, but still.
 
mother-of-god-super-troopers.thumbnail.jpg
 
I will never understand this. You'll pull over for this individual while he is in the ambulance or fire truck he is going to get, but not while he is on the way there? Why delay him?

Until he or she is IN that official ambulance, fire truck or police car, he/she is just driving one huge, ostentatiously lit, dangerous distraction and is subject to the same road laws as I. Every move I make to give this fool free passage has the potential to endanger me or the other people around me.

The rig SCREAMS urgency! when all it's doing is getting some hack to an emergency vehicle so he/she can respond to a non-emergent call that, if the driver is professional at all won't be driven to with one-fifth of the intensity of those lights.

Unmarked cop cars get all the respect they need from me because they use a simple, revolving light designed to get my attention not stun me into a fight or flight response.
 
Unmarked cop cars get all the respect they need from me because they use a simple, revolving light designed to get my attention not stun me into a fight or flight response.

unmarked cop cars, SUVs, and trucks are set up alot differently here. They are all set up with lights exactly like in the video (in the grill, headlights, taillights, etc.) so if it has lights and sirens then I am pulling over.

The only place I have seen the simple revolving light is in the movies.
 
Unmarked cop cars get all the respect they need from me because they use a simple, revolving light designed to get my attention not stun me into a fight or flight response.
I must admit, the only time I have seen an unmarked car with a simple revolving light is on Police Squad, Law & Order, and Homicide.

Every other unmarked car has a dash light, grill lights, and wigwags/headlight strobes, as well as a siren. not only that, but they also have strobes in the brake lights and reverse lights, and often on the rear deck.

If I were to hazard a guess, any cop that was only using a simple revolving light is probably in their personal car, with a cigarette plug so it can be removed easily and is only used on the rare times it's actually used.

Also, I can't speak for all states, but where I work, by state law it's either all or nothing. that means all lights on with an audible warning device, or none at all. there isn't any reduced intensity emergent response that you are talking about

Further, if you refuse to yield, that is your choice, but if they were going to help your family member in need, would you be the first person to be screaming that they took forever to get to the scene? I think it's grossly hypocritical for you to refuse to yield to a volunteer responder who is responding to a call (whether you agree with responses from home is irrelevant, as that is what the system uses), yet you will have them respond with lights and sirens in the ambulance to a call, and then judge them based on their response time.
 
Until he or she is IN that official ambulance, fire truck or police car, he/she is just driving one huge, ostentatiously lit, dangerous distraction and is subject to the same road laws as I. Every move I make to give this fool free passage has the potential to endanger me or the other people around me.

The rig SCREAMS urgency! when all it's doing is getting some hack to an emergency vehicle so he/she can respond to a non-emergent call that, if the driver is professional at all won't be driven to with one-fifth of the intensity of those lights.

Unmarked cop cars get all the respect they need from me because they use a simple, revolving light designed to get my attention not stun me into a fight or flight response.

Seems as if he responds to emergency calls too.

Fair warning, he drops a cuss word at the end.

[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Zxq_EN0xPE[/YOUTUBE]
 
I think it's grossly hypocritical for you to refuse to yield to a volunteer responder who is responding to a call (whether you agree with responses from home is irrelevant, as that is what the system uses), yet you will have them respond with lights and sirens in the ambulance to a call, and then judge them based on their response time.

I thought we already established that the seconds you shave off of response time by potentially endangering other people is not quite worth it. If that is the truth with marked, Official vehicles, then is it any less true with Yahoos such as whoever drives the truck in question? Who are you kidding? That's over-the-top and doesn't convey a professional behind the wheel; it's someone who wants to get noticed, not just get there.

...and where did I say I "judge them based on their response time"? I want responders to get there safely without harassing and endangering the rest of us.
 
Also, I can't speak for all states, but where I work, by state law it's either all or nothing. that means all lights on with an audible warning device, or none at all.

I was quite curious about that as well. It also seems worth nothing that although the lights on the front seem to me more than enough, it doesn't look like there is anything on the side specifically and since he didn't show off the back we might assume that there are none there. That will sure do a lot of good for visibility when he stops at an MVC.
 
The only place I have seen the simple revolving light is in the movies.

I have a Code-3 simple revolving light. Were you just referring to unmarked PD?

As far as response... My roads at 45MPH, I can safely in good weather go 50 or so... I have either a 7 minute or 8 minute ride to the station... depends on if I am going the speed limit, or 5 over.

Where the light is helpful is when Poland Springs water trucks are on the road. The do pull over when it is safe to do so.

But, we are perdiem 7 days a week 6a-6p so my typical reponse from home is only when I do my volly shifts. And I live so far away I encourage my driver and basic who is closer to the station to get the rig on the road and I go straight to the scene so that I can avoid the stress of rushing to the station. I prefer to think about the call and my safety.
 
I have a Code-3 simple revolving light. Were you just referring to unmarked PD?

Our area doesn't allow for anyone to respond code in POVs so I have not seen them on POVs. And I have not seen any of them on unmarked cop cars. The only place I have seen them is on movies and TV shows.

And now the arguement about "saving time" when going code 3 vs normal driving. I have no clue what the conditions are that you guys may face but for us going code saves minutes sometimes 10+ minutes.
 
Until he or she is IN that official ambulance, fire truck or police car, he/she is just driving one huge, ostentatiously lit, dangerous distraction and is subject to the same road laws as I.

Precisely.

The rig SCREAMS urgency!

No, I believe it screams: (images on page removed).

I think it's grossly hypocritical for you to refuse to yield to a volunteer responder who is responding to a call (whether you agree with responses from home is irrelevant, as that is what the system uses

A quick way to put an end to it that I have used in the past is to give the license plate number to the local dispatch agency: "Yeah, some jerkoff just blew past me at 20 over the posted speed limit on the wrong side of the double yellow on a curve. He's got emergency lights on his vehicle but he's driving like he's drunk". Nothing says "Back it off a few notches there Ricky" like a ticket with a hefty fine or license suspension for reckless driving. Most cops have zero tolerance for this sort of BS. Neither do fire chiefs who will no doubt not appreciate the negative impact on their department's reputation.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Seems as if he responds to emergency calls too.

Fair warning, he drops a cuss word at the end.

[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Zxq_EN0xPE[/YOUTUBE]

LOL Nothing like providing the local LEOs with evidence of you speeding. The only better thing than their dashcam footage of it is your own. :rolleyes:
 
Our area doesn't allow for anyone to respond code in POVs so I have not seen them on POVs. And I have not seen any of them on unmarked cop cars. The only place I have seen them is on movies and TV shows.

And now the arguement about "saving time" when going code 3 vs normal driving. I have no clue what the conditions are that you guys may face but for us going code saves minutes sometimes 10+ minutes.

Firefite... not arguing the going code 3 at all... I have the longest response to the station in my town... 8 minutes going speed limit... MAYBE if I am hauling butt in the middle of the night I can save 1.5 minutes off that... maybe... or I could hit a deer, sandy patch, moose, etc....

But... from the end of town furthest from the nearest Trauma center we have almost 45 minutes, 3 Towns and 2 cities to go through. Running code 3 when needed does save us time transporting.
 
LOL... all that equipment and some smoke got him that worked up. What an idiot. In Maine, ONLY the Chief can run a siren and any external lights. Everyone else is allowed one light inside the car. Most people just use visor LED's but I cannot afford one, as my crack habit takes all of my spare money. I do stick my head out the window and go "woo woo" from time to time though... when I know PD is already on scene.
 
Until he or she is IN that official ambulance, fire truck or police car, he/she is just driving one huge, ostentatiously lit, dangerous distraction and is subject to the same road laws as I.

Depends on where you're located. In some areas a POV can be registered as a legitimate emergency vehicle for the purpose of responding to a scene or to get the applicable emergency vehicle. As such it is exempt from many of the laws applicable to your personal vehicle while it is responding to an emergency.

Making assumptions that this is just some whacker overcompensating for some unknown deficiency and that you don't have to afford his position the respect you would if he were driving that ambulance, fire truck, or police car is what puts people in danger. Not him/her.
 
Back
Top