EpiEMS
Forum Deputy Chief
- 3,845
- 1,164
- 113
their finance people see the value in it
FWIW: They have a nice revenue source (taxes), see page 42 & 43 of the 2016 annual report.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
their finance people see the value in it
Well, given the fact that it seems likely that there is more of a rural interface within Sussex's coverage area, and much more time to adequately perform the duties set forth by your employer, and within your scope there, whereas in Seattle I would imagine the scene to ED time is much more urban---this would be a personal preference.assuming you mean sussex county DE, I fail to see what geography has to do with it...
Lol ease up, hermano. I'll bypass the seemingly cantankerous post, and presume that there was much more wit behind it. It's hard to read through people's tones via post comments alone.I get a valid point, but not even a like on my post?
I invested time and money into myself to become a paramedic. It screwed around with my life and I have no interest in doing it again. I doubt I would have any issue passing it again. Paramedic school is an obstacle that needs to be overcome to be successful in EMS, why would you do it twice and delay your success?kind of an odd tangent, but why not? Assuming you are already a paramedic, wouldn't P school be easy, since you already know and passed the course?
Could it be a waste of your time? sure, but you're getting paid during the entire process. Assuming you know every thing, that it should be a breeze, and if you don't (maybe your program skipped a few things), then you can learn new stuff and be brought up to "their standards."
Many municipal fire departments send every new hire through their academy again, regardless of if you are qualified or not. How is this any different?
IDK, everyone having the same high clinical standards, everyone on the same page in terms of operations, and a rigorous training process where you can make 110k after 3 years and you primarily treat only ALS patients?
Or think of it this way: if everyone wasn't on the same page, and held to the same high standards, do you think they would still have such a positive reputation an a high performing EMS agency?
Personally, I can't stand being made to jump through unnecessary hoops. I would not necessarily find having to repeat paramedic school insulting, but certainly a needless waste of time and resources, and therefore a significant deterrent to applying at any agency that would require it. I also have to wonder what the motivation behind such a requirement is. If it is to mold everyone into an identical drone in terms of the way that they practice, then it definitely would not be the place for me.
Bigger picture, sending every new employee to school for an entire year just to refresh their knowledge and "get everyone on the same page" seems like a collosal waste of resources, and it seems unlikely that King Co can't find more pressing ways to use that money and personnel.
a whole lot of wit.Lol ease up, hermano. I'll bypass the seemingly cantankerous post, and presume that there was much more wit behind it. It's hard to read through people's tones via post comments alone.
If I wanted to move to Seattle, and I love to work for 6 months in medic school, for a good agency, and have them pay me and guarantee me a job once I completed the programBut also understand that we do hire EMTs that are going through Medic school for the first time
In a career? I know paramedics that do that many IV starts every year, and between 15 and 30 intubations (some more than others).... Then again, they work in a tiered system, and only see ALS patients....and as for the experienced provider, there are not many that can claim they have performed 30 intubations 350+ IV starts in their career, and even if they have no one can claim they would not benefit from that experience!