terrible one
Always wandering
- 881
- 87
- 28
To add to that above,
That fact is because there are more fire engines than ambulances. That fact is followed by the fact that the fire departments has a better union and lobbysist that are able to sway politicians and the public that their communities will fall apart with a fire engine every other block.
Common sense - if 80% of your calls are medical in nature, and rising, while fire related incidents continue to decrease why do communities need more and more fire engines and less and less ambulances?
Also what percent of BLS calls with arriving BLS or ALS engines cancelled the squads? Probably a hard piece of data to retrieve, but I bet you it is less than you think.
Easy. Elminate the squads and increase the number of ambulances. Put the paramedics on the ambulances.
In theory having every response vehicle staffed with only paramedics makes sense. However, the paradox of that involves education and training. If every vehicle only has paramedics how long before their skills decrease to a dangerous fashion? How often is each one involved in starting IVs, pushing meds, and intubating? Then converse that data with any statistical data showing an increase in patient care with an increased number of paramedics on scene. Then also factor in the cost of paying paramedic/firefighters to EMT/firefighters. Now state why does it make sense again?
Not everyone shares your experience and in fact your personal experience is an invalid arguement against having multiple apparatus arrive to your emergency. Could you not have had a pleasant experience if only 3 man engine showed up? What about just an ambulance?
The fact is that the closest rigs with EMTs are fire engines and they can usually BLS a call by canceling the squad and then let the private ambulance transport.
That fact is because there are more fire engines than ambulances. That fact is followed by the fact that the fire departments has a better union and lobbysist that are able to sway politicians and the public that their communities will fall apart with a fire engine every other block.
Common sense - if 80% of your calls are medical in nature, and rising, while fire related incidents continue to decrease why do communities need more and more fire engines and less and less ambulances?
Also what percent of BLS calls with arriving BLS or ALS engines cancelled the squads? Probably a hard piece of data to retrieve, but I bet you it is less than you think.
How could you save money any other way without drastically increasing response times?
Easy. Elminate the squads and increase the number of ambulances. Put the paramedics on the ambulances.
Put two medics on every engine in the county and pay them way more? This system seems to make sense to me and as a citizen who lives in LA County Fire service area I can't say that myself, my family, or anyone I know has ever had a poor experience with LA County Fire EMS or the private ambulances.
In theory having every response vehicle staffed with only paramedics makes sense. However, the paradox of that involves education and training. If every vehicle only has paramedics how long before their skills decrease to a dangerous fashion? How often is each one involved in starting IVs, pushing meds, and intubating? Then converse that data with any statistical data showing an increase in patient care with an increased number of paramedics on scene. Then also factor in the cost of paying paramedic/firefighters to EMT/firefighters. Now state why does it make sense again?
Not everyone shares your experience and in fact your personal experience is an invalid arguement against having multiple apparatus arrive to your emergency. Could you not have had a pleasant experience if only 3 man engine showed up? What about just an ambulance?