- 7,881
- 2,846
- 113
I think more to the point is one of the core concepts of EMS: "If you've seen one EMS system, you've seen one EMS system.". What works and is appropriate for BEMS doesn't have anything to do with anything as far as other systems.
There is, of course, a huge tradeoff to be had with carrying handcuffs. On one side, there are patients it'd be nice to have as close as practicable to an absolute restraint on. The flip side is that it then blurs the line in patient's perception between us and cops, a distinction we rely heavily on to do our jobs. Our patients have to trust us, to let us poke holes in them and fill them with drugs, to answer us honestly when we ask if they've taken anything, and indeed, to not get aggressive with us in the first place. Unfortunately, as much as in infuriates me, people don't trust cops the way they trust us.
I would worry heavily about that before I did anything to marginalize that distinction. Since I assume that the leadership of BEMS aren't morons, I'm guessing they did, too. They obviously decided that in the balance of concerns, handcuffs were worth the trade-off.
Doesn't mean it applies elsewhere, and it certainly isn't a step that should be taken lightly.
I appreciate this mindset. I love to look at how and why certain systems operate the way they do. That said, there are certain parallels that can be drawn across the board. Boston is a big-city urban EMS system. There are plenty other cities like Boston. I think it is certainly viable to draw comparisons to similar systems in similar areas so long as everyone is clear that the comparison will not be perfect.