"Requested Salary"

Though I will agree that "the easiest way" was poorly phrased. I should have said, "the surest way".

Supply and demand, move on may very well mean to change fields. If spots can't get filled, wages go up if demand isn't flexible. If we are willing to work for peanuts as a group, that's all we'll get.
 
If you leave a job the minute you feel undervalued, the only "sure thing" is that you will be changing jobs often and may end up unemployed when future employers recognize this pattern.
 
The entire thrust of my post is that we need to be willing to move on, if we deem it necessary. Not to jump ship at the first opportunity, so let's just clear that up.
 
The entire thrust of my post is that we need to be willing to move on, if we deem it necessary. Not to jump ship at the first opportunity, so let's just clear that up.
The best way to make more money has always been (and always will be) to make yourself difficult to replace. Any tactic short of that will fluctuate in effectiveness based on current economic conditions.

EMTs may be some of the most easily replaced workers because you have simple certification and an (already) low wage paired with an eager potential workforce. Best to figure out which system you will enjoy and make yourself indispensable to them.
 
Last edited:
Kevin...it is reading comprehension and reality. As I stated, if I have two identical candidates, why would I take the one who asks for more? I along with others gave very reasonable replies to how to answer the question on an application.

And if you think "moving on is easiest way to get a raise" then you have a lot of growing up to do. When push comes to shove and you feel you deserve more money, then you come prepared with facts and examples demonstrating that. The moment you try to force the hand by using your presence as your only reason, then you have the employer's back against the wall, the natural human reaction of being defensive will kick in, and you will be seen as nothing more than a number with 1000 people behind you ready to assume your position.

This is anything but proactive.
Let's call a spade a spade, shall we? most for-profit EMS agencies don't give out raises, unless they are forced to do so. Simple economics, their goal is to make a profit, and increasing expenses (in salaries) when there is no increase in revenue leads to a net loss. So unless you can show a reason for them to give you more money (typically through a change in position, and we all know how relatively few opportunities exist in EMS that don't involve being on an ambulance), you aren't getting more money.

Independent 3rd party services are often in a similar position: if you aren't bringing in more money, why should they pay you more?

That all being said, I've worked for agencies that didn't give raises. Either the county hasn't done it for the last 5 years, or as a general rule, they didn't give raises. Suffice it to say, there was no incentive to actually stay at the agency. In fact, the only way to make more money was to apply to another agency, get a job offer, and then come to the director with your two weeks notice, and see if they will give you more money to stay. Not a great retention plan, is it?

Before I left Jersey, I was making a little more than $20 as an EMT, which was up from around $18 when I started. The only reason I got that was because the union had a contract, which guaranteed us a hire, 1 year, and 2 year pay rate. After 2 years the hospital didn't give raises. The only way to make more money was to leave for another agency. if you asked our coordinators, they always said "we don't have the money, and if you don't like it, feel free to explore other jobs, and we will replace you within 2 weeks." Like I said, not much of an incentive to stay with the agency.

The other thing is most agencies already know how much they will be paying their new hires. Either everyone starts at the same rate, or they give more based on experience, but it's usually not an arbitrary number.

I'd rather put a lower number on my application, so it doesn't get tossed immediately. Once I get the job offer, then we negotiate salary, not during the interview, and not prior to the interview. If we can agree on a number, I can accept the job, if not, then I can pursue other options.

But with little to no experience, your probably going to be starting on the lowest end of the salary scale, with no negotiating power, regardless of how well you did in class.
 
If a potential employer simply ignores my app because I put $0.50-1.00 more than they pay, without even talking to me about it during an interview, I definitely don't want to work for them.

You are missing the point. If I have identical candidates on paper and had to make a choice, who do you think I would choose?

Additionally you also overlooked where I said if someone was way over market price on initial application, no where did I say if they put .50-$1 more....then later I connected that comment with the fact that those who overprice themselves on initial application are typically the type who will jump ship at .50 more an hour.

Your reading comprehension sucks.

You're fired. No wait, you're not hired.
 
On some electronic applications it will require a number...I always enter 0 or 10000000.

If I see someone way above market price, I will put them at the back of the pile.

As I stated, if I have two identical candidates, why would I take the one who asks for more?

You are missing the point. If I have identical candidates on paper and had to make a choice, who do you think I would choose?

Please don't insult my intelligence because I disagree with your hiring process. Maybe you didn't state your case as clearly as you think you did. And I I did not miss your point, I still don't want to work for you if you wouldn't even give me an interview because I requested a higher wage than some one else on an application.
 
You quoted me yet still fail to see the point and did nothing to explain why I should or should not employ the practice. I did not present conflicting statements and I gave clear rationale.

And your closing statement...well you would not have the option of working for me because you would never get the interview...as I stated. And it is NOT just a higher wage we are discussing...we are discussing a higher than market wage for a position with minimal entry level qualifications and 1000 people wanting the same job.

Don't hate on me for being a realist.
 
CHILL OUT!!!!!! We disagree, thats fine! It was a simple question- and our opinions on the hiring process dont matter at this point because we are not applying to be working with each other! Gooosfraba..... Goooooosfraba.......
 
It's odd that when the most informed person on a given topic (in this case a buisness owner who would appear to be pretty successful) gives an opinion that contradicts what someone else wants to believe their immediate reaction is to freak out. So shocking. So, so shocking.

Yes, that last bit was sarcasm.
 
There is a distinct lack of politeness in this thread. What is the first rule here?
 
My way or the highway?
 
No one talks about Fight Club?
 
and our opinions on the hiring process dont matter at this point because we are not applying to be working with each other!

I only wanted to highlight this statement as an example. You never know who or when you might actually be trying to network with for a position or who a future employer might be. I have actually hired a few people from this and other websites...and the reason I approached them was because how they had conducted themselves over the years, their level of inquisitiveness, and the willingness to share their knowledge base...I have hit several home runs using this method.
 
I just feel that there is a lot of unnecessary rudeness and inconsiderateness, and there is no reason for personal attacks. We are professionals here (well some) and we should act as such, imho. I jist wanted toask a simple question
 
Back
Top