jbiedebach
Forum Probie
- 14
- 5
- 3
I get the point of the article, but I think it is a little off base. The principle is that delayed care = worse patient outcome and marathons delay care. Point taken. But lots of things delay care. Calls in the middle of the night have a slower response times because crews are usually asleep. Calls during rush hour might have a slower response time. It happens. And if you are at a point in your life where 10 mins either way makes the difference, then be glad you live in 2017 because up to 1970 (the beginning of EMS) your call to 911 (which also didn't exist) would likely have brought a hearse with 2 ambulance attendants, who might have been able to give you O2, and that is about it.
I think we have developed this attitude that because we can save some that we must save all, and that is simply not realistic. If the goal of EMS was to prevent death then we would all be doctors, there would be an ER on every corner and there would be special highways reserved for ambulances. We must live life in the balance. Marathons help a lot more people than they hurt.
I think we have developed this attitude that because we can save some that we must save all, and that is simply not realistic. If the goal of EMS was to prevent death then we would all be doctors, there would be an ER on every corner and there would be special highways reserved for ambulances. We must live life in the balance. Marathons help a lot more people than they hurt.