That’s what I was taught in basic, but not what I was taught in medic. I can find peer-reviewed studies that show high-flow O2 = potentially bad for emphysema. I cannot show any studies showing that it is ok within “X” amount of time.
Which is part of the problem. When EMTs are taught one thing, and medics are taught something else, conflicts occur, because both are right according to their training. When I took my first EMT course in NJ, as well as my second EMT course in NY, I was taught that every patient should get high flow oxygen; not administering it was a critical fail on my exam.
And of course, in 90% of the patients that I put on a high flow NRB, the moment a paramedic showed up, they took it off them, because they were taught that it wasn't needed. And 98% of the time, when we brought someone into the hospital on a NRB, the first thing they did was take it off them.
Medicine should be taught consistently, from basic first aid, to EMT, to paramedic, to nurse, to doctor. The same concepts should be the same throughout the progression.
All in all, more than the new EMT’s, what irritates me much more are EMT’s with 20 years of experience who will never advance their training in any way, but will tell the medics how to do their job, and will not back down when confronted with reasonable scientific/medical evidence.
don't you guys have the same medical director? follow the same protocols, and have the same standards? I mean, once the paramedic shows up, the EMT should be handing the patient off to them (figuratively), and then doing what the paramedic is asking for, as they are the highest level of clinical care present. The EMT can make suggestions, and if you have a 20 year EMT, I imaging they have seen a thing or two, so their suggestions shouldn't be ignored, but at the end of the day, it is the paramedic's call. And many paramedics have been "saved" (and I'm using that term in the loosest possible way) from missing something or making the wrong call by listening to their EMT counterparts.
Example is: I had an EMT complain about a medic for not giving high-flow O2 to an emphysema patient with an SP02 of 90%. The medic even explained why to the EMT. The EMT was pissed because they didn’t grasp the concept. They won’t advance their training but they’ll make their ignorant opinions well known....My point was about how annoying it is when I have an EMT complaining to me that a Paramedic they were with chose a different treatment option which was within the protocol, was based on solid reasoning, and based on their report seemed to be the best treatment for the situation, but the EMT is complaining because they are too ignorant to see different sides to the same coin.
Was the patient having difficulty breathing? were they cyanotic? were accessory muscles being used? were they feeling dizzy?
If the answer to these questions is yes, than your paramedic was likely wrong, and the patient should have received high flow oxygen, because, yes, long term high flow oxygen is bad for the patient, but in the acute setting, if they need oxygen, give oxygen. You shouldn't be knocking out their respiratory drive with 10 minutes of O2 via NRB, but it can help with other things.
Now if your patient was in no distress, and the only reason the EMT said the patient needed high flow O2 was because the pulse ox said 90, that's a different story....