Medium-Duty Ambulances

T

TreySpooner65

Forum Lieutenant
Messages
153
Reaction score
7
Points
18
I'm sure there is a reason, but why do some agencies use medium duty ambulances?

med-duty.jpg


Here we just use the smaller ambulances, mostly just the van conversions, but some have the box on the back. I believe all of those here are bariatric.

2766059962_84429a6c86.jpg
 
Having worked in Type I, II, III, and International chassis rigs, I prefer the F-450 type I rigs. I really don't see any benefit to the medium duty ambulances at all.
 
Devilz311 said:
Having worked in Type I, II, III, and International chassis rigs, I prefer the F-450 type I rigs. I really don't see any benefit to the medium duty ambulances at all.
Click to expand...

I prefer an International by far.
 
Some fire departments utilize them to double as heavy rescue trucks. The added space hold all the equipment on one exterior wall.
 
Medium's work well for rescue if you're lugging a rehab trailer or use it for winch mounts. Better ground clearance. Has more room and can handle more weight in the back (if you have to have alot of providers in there). Most services also find that they last longer than lighter duty trucks (I'm not a mechanic so couldn't really tell you why).

They're also prettier :)
 
TreySpooner65 said:
I'm sure there is a reason, but why do some agencies use medium duty ambulances?

med-duty.jpg


Here we just use the smaller ambulances, mostly just the van conversions, but some have the box on the back. I believe all of those here are bariatric.

2766059962_84429a6c86.jpg
Click to expand...

Medium duties are liked and often used by critical care and NICU/PICU services. They like the additional space for providers (in the front and back), more storage room for equipment, floor space for interventions (Ecmo, balloon pumps, etc.) and more comfortable for patients (and parents, etc).

As others have said, some fire departments like storing and using other equipment off of these rigs.
 
In my experience, type II vans are cheaper, which is why you see them in for profit companies. not only that, but the vans are GREAT for stable IFT calls where you only have or only will have 2 providers in the back.

As for medium duty trucks, they are expensive, but they last forever. so if it costs you $100,000 for a type 3, the medium duty will cost you $150,000. but while the type 3 will need to be replaced after 10 years or 100,000 miles, the medium duty will last 15 years or 150,000 miles (of course I'm making the numbers up, but the ratios are accurate).

Also the medium duty trucks are great for ICU transfers, when you have 2-4 providers in the back treating the patients for extended periods of time.
 
DrParasite said:
Also the medium duty trucks are great for ICU transfers, when you have 2-4 providers in the back treating the patients for extended periods of time.
Click to expand...

The boxes on most medium duty ambulances have more of a MICU feel than the boxes on our light duty Type III's. Definitely feel like you have room to work.

Plus for some strange reason the International chassis has a better turning radius than the Chevy or Ford chassis Type III's. Not driven a Dodge, so I can't comment on those.
 
All of the fire departments here run medium duty ambos. Lots of room for me to do ALSsey stuff.
 
The medium duty ambulances are pretty much no where to be seen in my area. Private ambulance companies use mostly type 2 with a couple of type 3s. Fire departments use type 3s. The only medium duty one I have seen is our mobile communication center.
 
No one it seems uses them in Colorado, which is likely attributable to the lack of four wheel drive on most medium duty chassis. Back in Massachusetts though, the well funded fire departments and third service agencies love them. I thought the ride was rather rough though. An international 4400 is a work truck, an ambulance box is barely enough weight for the suspension to work properly and it felt like there was a lot more bouncing and slamming.
 
Yeah some use them for the extra room/capacity. Or as a status symbol.

For the NICU/PICU/transport teams that go long distances the ability to have a large module for the comfort makes sense. They also tend to have larger modules which settle the suspension some.

For 911 response they are overkill. Too big. Why do you need that many providers on a 911 call? And rescue tools? Are they supposed to be the medics or rescue?

The economics dont make sense. They cost alot more, get worse fuel economy, have the same lifespan as a lighter duty vehicle and the maintenance/parts cost more.
 
Why Boston EMS uses them is beyond me. I wouldn't wanna be driving one of them in the city... And many of them are BLS units.
 
rwik123 said:
Why Boston EMS uses them is beyond me. I wouldn't wanna be driving one of them in the city... And many of them are BLS units.
Click to expand...

Not sure what Boston's chassis is, but I know our Internationals have a tighter turning radius than our Chevy Type III's.
 
Maybe they just don't like their knees touching the stretcher? Icky stuff happens on that thing.
 
Milla3P said:
Maybe they just don't like their knees touching the stretcher? Icky stuff happens on that thing.
Click to expand...

BEMS don't have center mount cots. There is a lot of room between the bench and the stretcher.
 
Medium duty ambulances look impressive and are nearly always purchased with public funds.

I can think of very few services that actually need them, they embody what's wrong when municipalities are entrusted to spend public funds. Services with excess funds seem to buy the biggest ambulance money can buy.

With the exception of very few critical care / PICU units, I'm not sure what they accomplish that can't be accomplished with the significantly cheaper Type III rig.
 
DrParasite said:
In my experience, type II vans are cheaper, which is why you see them in for profit companies. not only that, but the vans are GREAT for stable IFT calls where you only have or only will have 2 providers in the back.

As for medium duty trucks, they are expensive, but they last forever. so if it costs you $100,000 for a type 3, the medium duty will cost you $150,000. but while the type 3 will need to be replaced after 10 years or 100,000 miles, the medium duty will last 15 years or 150,000 miles (of course I'm making the numbers up, but the ratios are accurate).

Also the medium duty trucks are great for ICU transfers, when you have 2-4 providers in the back treating the patients for extended periods of time.
Click to expand...
I agree with the longevity, but it turns out to be cheaper overall to just remount the box on a new chasis, rather than starting with a medium duty... that's why it's so common for departments.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top