What to do if an IV comes out during transport?

Wee-EMT said:
If the pt has an IV in place and IV's are out of your scope, you should be driving and the paramedic should be attending.
Click to expand...

Not so, at least in my state.

If it's in place PTA, and it's an IFT, not a scene response, I see no reason why a EMT-B couldn't handle it. Especially if it's locked off. Same with g-tubes and central lines. as long as they're clamped, why not?

Edit: Dang, looks like Mountain Res-Q beat me to it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mountain Res-Q said:
Unless it is a BLS IFT. EMTs in most places are allowed to monitor an IV; which basiclly measn making sure it is running at the rate dictated by the hospital. If the IV is blown dring a BLS transfer, then stop the fluids, and notify someone who can do something about it when you reach your destination. However, it is doubtful that a blown IV is a cause for concern at eh BLS level, because If the IV was needed so desperately during the transport then, yes it should have been ALS. At the BLS level the pateitn should be stable and the IV is just there, and not life and death.
Click to expand...

To add to that, I'm not sure I've ever had an IV site "blow" while I've been transporting. Only scenario I could see for that would be when an infusion is pressurized, or perhaps the patient could accidentally dislodge the catheter.

The biggest thing, I'd think, would be keeping positional IV's open, and that usually involves simply asking the patient not to bend their arm quite so much.
 
rmellish said:
To add to that, I'm not sure I've ever had an IV site "blow" while I've been transporting. Only scenario I could see for that would be when an infusion is pressurized, or perhaps the patient could accidentally dislodge the catheter.

The biggest thing, I'd think, would be keeping positional IV's open, and that usually involves simply asking the patient not to bend their arm quite so much.
Click to expand...

Agreed, I just meant that ANY problem with an IV (beyond a bent arm) that an EMT-B (w/o any IV training add-on) has been entrusted with should be treated the same. Shut it off and tell someone that can do somehting about it, becasue YES, EMT's can monitor and IV, whatever that is supposed to empower us to do.
 
gillysaurus said:
In all my time as an EMT-B/IV in Colorado, I've never heard it called an EMT-B"+". But now when anybody asks, I'm telling them I'm at the "plus" level of EMT certification!
Click to expand...

Funny, I was thinking the exact same thing. We are EMT-B/IV aka EMT-B IV Certified. But I kinda like the '+'. Makes us sound superior.
 
pdibsie said:
Funny, I was thinking the exact same thing. We are EMT-B/IV aka EMT-B IV Certified. But I kinda like the '+'. Makes us sound superior.
Click to expand...

I like this idea. If we are gonna be using math to identify ourselves, then from now on I will identifiey myself only as an EMT to the fourth power. B)
 
Mountain, you could always use EMT^0...
 
Since we can use the math as a level, can we start applying the negative (-) connotation to some?
 
You mean like EMT-I/99=EMT-P(-)?
 
^ Hehehe.

CCP = EMT-P(+) ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top