I know a little bit, but not what happened with Director Kirkwood (no one seems to be talking about that, and I have asked).....
Skip (who I have met personally, but haven't spoken to in almost two years) is an agent of change; he was brought in to fix a system that was experiencing numerous issues. DCoEMS has been involved in some legal action prior to his arrival, many of their paramedics weren't permitted to intubate as per their medical director, one of their larger contracted EMS agencies was under investigation and in the process of folding due to financial irregularities, and their system had suffered from years of financial neglect (stations were falling apart, not enough units for the call volume, etc). So he inherited a **** show, and was tasked with making things better.
1) Durham County EMS pays less than many of the surrounding counties, at both the EMT and paramedic level. And they run more calls than anyone else in the region (the exception being Wake). So they did experience a seasoned paramedic exodus to other agencies. This has been an uphill battle, and the county FINALLY has approved payrates for all DCoEMS employees.
2) DCoEMS used to have a "hell week" in their schedule system, where you worked three day shifts and then 4 night shifts (at 12 hour shifts, with the flip being on saturday night so it wouldn't be OT), followed by 7 days off. He got rid of the rotating schedule, and set everyone on day or nights, with set 12 hour shifts. And he asked people what they wanted, instead of telling them (which apparently didn't go over well with some people).
3) Their medical director quit, and a new one was hired in 2015, and we all know how much people like change. And I heard through the rumor mill that she kinda sucks as a person, and isn't letting them do anything super progressive.
4) There have been several people that have been terminated (and some that rightfully deserved it), and others that have been disciplined. I got the impression that having a strong leadership presence has been lacking in recent years, so once someone started cleaning house, people got nervous. And I did hear that some of his supervisors fired people who probably didn't deserve a full termination, but I did only hear one side of the story second hand.
5) They purchase a bunch of brand new sprinter ambulances. They were different than what previous administrations purchased, and some liked them, while others didn't
6) They obtained all new uniforms, and redesigned their patch and badges. Some liked it, others not so much. Some asked why they were spending money on this while other items didn't have the funding for.
So I do think in many ways, the deck was stacked against the new administrator, who still had all of the old administrative staff, and now he was telling the county administration that he needed a lot more money to handle the call volume (50% increase in staff), something the department had never asked for previously. And he was enacting changes, cleaning out dead wood, and I do think he was trying to make improvements to a system that had been sorely neglected for years. And besides, agents of change typically only have a 3 to 5 year career span in director roles, compared to those that go with the flow that last 10+ years.
Many of the causes of the low morale (low pay, poor equipment, crappy stations) are improving, and morale will increase, but many of these things do take time and approval above the director level. Give it two years, with the agency getting the funding it needs and deserves, and I bet you will see the numbers increasing, regardless of who is at the helm.
By the way, if "About 33 percent said EMS provided outstanding customer service (down from 60 percent in 2015)", that would reflect more on the field staff than the actual administration.
I will also say that I know of at least one person who worked for DCoEMS, left for a neighboring county EMS agency to be a whiteshirt, and went back to DCoEMS to be a field staffer. So even though it might be bad now, it is still better than other places.
As for the investigation and suspension for the director, I find it interesting that they publicize in the news the announcement of the accusation and that an investigation is underway, but I haven't read anything about the outcome of the investigation, or what he was even investigated for.