Yes, but how many wind up not getting paid because of subpar charting with no way to enforce or mandate standards of documentation?
Excuse me? Three words: audit and review. We regularly got dinged for poor documentation, regardless of volunteer or paid status. Continuous quality improvement involves a lot more than just direct patient care issues and protocol modifications.
You think inability to document proficiently is something reserved only for volunteers?
What she said.
But most of the documentation complaints I hear come from the individuals who do the billing for volunteer services.
As someone who used to review ~10,000 call reports a year (an educated guess based on an average of about 30 cases reviewed per day)- both paid and volunteer- as part of his work as the quality control "officer" for a medical director that oversaw most of the services in a six-county area, I would have to disagree with you there. The grammar for a lot of the paid EMS professionals was just as bad, if not worse than their volunteer counterparts. Of course, this could also have something to do with the fact that our volunteers tended to have more college education than the paid personnel (we tracked this) and spent more time at the hospital (or scene for the case of non-transport agencies) on average before marking back into service (we used this as a way to judge who had more time to write their reports).
We had a scale for documentation violations that depended upon the severity of the issue at hand:
-Minor issue: poor spelling, handwriting, grammar, syntax, typos, etc.
-Moderate issue: unclear documentation of procedures, failure to include patient information on the run report (or other things likely to screw up billing), medication administration, etc
-Major issue: failure to turn in reports (first and second offenses), etc
-Critical issue: failure to turn in reports (recidivist); failure to document administration and/or disposal of controlled substances;
Usually, the minor and moderate issues would get the person a verbal warning ("Hey Bob, learn how to freaking spell 'amiodarone' will you please?") or one of my infamous sticky notes (I had specially made post-it notes that had common problems on it so that I didn't have to write out each issue....I just checked off what was an issue). If the problem did not cease, then they were usually called in to have a little chat and then a written warning was given along with suggestions on how to fix the problem. If you still could not learn, you often would find yourself without a job unless you had a dang good mitigating circumstance. Note: I am not trying to imply that we fired people simply for not being able to spell or write....it had to be pretty severe, usually to the point where you could not figure out what they were trying to convey. Major or critical issues were usually treated with suspension and, if severe enough, termination on the first offense.
Our cases were about a 60/40 split for volunteer and paid respectively, yet we found that ~70% of the non-minor issues (based on the above description) went out to paid personnel. If you looked at the minor issues, it was something like 60/40 so it was about evenly divided between the two groups.