I've been accused of that many times, actually. I usually never conceed if they can't show me how I'm wrong and have proof of their answer. But man. Been in EMS 24 years and doesn't know how many vertebrae are in the spine!
Arrrgh!
I feel your pain. I got into an argument with our arrhythmia instructor over what I interpreted as a junctional rhythm.
The instructor is a VERY intelligent CCRN, former medic, sits on the regional subcommittee for our OEMS, even most of those in the area who don't know her personally recognize her name through the grapevine..............And then there is me....a simple medic student questioning her when I am positive I see a junctional rhythm.
She will question you nonstop even if you give the right answer so that you can explain your rationale. Problem is that if you are wrong, you look and feel like a HUGE idiot (Hell, the way she questioned you, you felt like an idiot even when you were right).
Long story short, she informed me that I couldn't interpret it as a junctional rhythm because she didn't specify which lead the strip was representing. To which the subject of every one of my counter-arguments was: "You never specified which lead all the ones that were correctly answered as NSR's were so whose to say they were sinus in origin"
Me and her argued for a full 25 mins after the class was *suppose* to end, keeping everyone there late, so I was everyone's 'top guy' that day.
I conceded. I fully understood her point in regards to lead placement and conduction pathways but my point was a real one too. So for every rhythm I was faced with on one of her tests I would mark my answer and then write aftewards "Assuming Lead <II, III, MCL, etc....>"