Johnny Foley
Forum Crew Member
- 30
- 0
- 0
You do not understand the economics of health care. This much is painfully obvious. There are many reasons that the patient was transported to kaiser, and most of those reasons benefit the patient herself.
Sure, I get that. But three hours after she rolled her car and lost her hand?! Are you kidding me?! Give me any reason that she shouldn't have been given a bed at SFGH or even Kaiser SF. I guarantee that if you were that girl, the last place on earth you would want to be is in a car on the highway, much less an ambulance designed to get places fast, not long distances smoothly. I rolled my car when I was 16 on a highway in NY. For maybe 2 years after that I was anxious anytime I was in a car that was braking even just lightly on the highway. There is no decent argument for why a stable pt s/p MVC should be forced back onto the highway to fulfill contract requirements, so don't even try it.
And PS, the phrase that you used "Economics of Health Care" is an oxymoron. I don't deny the realities of it, but it is a backwards concept nonetheless.
And to JPINV, it is illegal for EMS to refuse a call for any reason other than safety for the crew. I ALMOST refused it, and had I, the union couldn't have helped me. The union is fair, unlike Kaiser.