Do we, as paramedics, tend to avoid pain management, complex ventilators, new-type alternate airways and the like for reasons of educational or knowledge deficiency, a desire for simplicity above fractional improvements in effectiveness, familiarity with existing options or simply tradition?
Agencies avoid new things for all these reasons. With the rise of actual science in our treatments, i feel there is reluctance to implement new things without a proven benefit on a large scale. SMR is something that 100% of providers deal with, and changing the national view will be important and makes sense to most people once shown the evidence. Things like IN Narcan for BLS may not be as readily adopted because not everyone deals with those patients on a consistent basis (like my agency) so it would sit in the truck and expire again and again, costing the agency money.
How amicable is your agency to change?
Somewhat. We are a new (2 years old in December) PD-based system, but our director is a lifelong volunteer. He is an excellent guy, but myself and our clinical coordinator have had to drag him kicking and screaming into the 21st century. Regionally, my county is still 85-90% volunteer, so as a whole, not much change is going on there. Some individuals are good, but most haven't picked up an EMS document since the class.
Our tactic for changing things is basically bludgeoning the department heads with scientific evidence. Thankfully our medical directors attitude is "If you guys can prove it and support it, ill support you"
How about you in your own practice?
Im here arent i?
On a larger level, do you see yourself as a transporter or as a clinician? What about your peers? Your agency?
I try to be a clinician, especially as i gain more education the closer i get to the NCLEX and i understand this stuff more. My peers are improving, because we email and leave relevant articles and studies around the station. Some are more receptive to this than others, but everyone improves because those that do a lot of research improve them by osmosis.
Unfortunately, our clients view us as transporters
Im going to say it, intelligence, and by extension, education. Those that poses the education, even if it isnt in EMS or medicine, are more open to the science and rational of improving and changing. I posses a BA in History, my clinical coordinator got his first BA in Psychology (MS in Homeland Security), our director has a BS and MS in Accounting. The guys i work with who are most resistant have Associates degrees or less. This is the same across all levels of providers. I know some really stupid Paramedics.
EMT should at least be an Associates of Science, Paramedics should be at least a Bachelors of Science.