bstone
Forum Deputy Chief
- 2,066
- 1
- 0
I will reply once I get things in order. Just a moment please.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wait a minute. So you're backtracking from "Items 1, 2, and 3 are needed on basically every call and almost all of my patients gets them" to "Well, at least 1 of the three are likely to be used, the more serious the patient the more likely they'll get all three, and the provision that there's an "emergency" present"?
So, yes, I agree that the sicker the patient is the more likely they are to get at least one of those three, and more likely all three of them. That, however, bears no resemblence to your original claim and doesn't address at all the fact that EMS abuses oxygen more than Rush Limbaugh abuses OxyContin.
I was watching Emergency! while making that posting and Johnny and Roy were starting an IV while a patient was on O2 and a monitor.
They also used IVs, monitors, and oxygen a lot on NBC's Trauma. What does Trauma and Emergency! have in common? They're fiction.
A little knowledge is a dangerous thing.
salmon makes me sick. I think i'm going to go have some salmon. :rofl:
I'm kind of a fan of that whole "charging for what we do" thing. Might make some folks think twice about putting O2 on pts who don't need it.
I really don't think those folks even care about their pt.'s bill...if they are even aware that every little thing they mark on their run sheet gets a thorough look-over by the billing department.
i do care actually. It is irresponsible of me as a patient advocate to perform a service the patient doesn't need when i know they will struggle or not be able to pay the bill.
I strongly feel those that throw their patient on oxygen regardless of the need are either seriously needing further education or need to step out of the profession.
I really can't see why O2 is important in this patient...
I do care actually. It is irresponsible of me as a patient advocate to perform a service the patient doesn't need when I know they will struggle or not be able to pay the bill.
I strongly feel those that throw their patient on oxygen regardless of the need are either seriously needing further education or need to step out of the profession.
@NYMedic828
Sorry, but in my opinion, this patient did not need oxygen.
I know that I was not there to access him , but according to the info given, he had no respiratory distress, SOB, altered state of consciousness,altered circulation, politrauma, chest pain, hypovolemia or other clinical signs/symptoms that require O2, so this patient do not need O2.
The theory of giving oxygen to all patients its really annoying. Ok, can have a placebo effect? Perhaps, but it is waste of money and resources.