I get the idea the medical community drops the ball because the definitive studies are not being published (where I can find them), and after the procedure is done, the surgeon says "My part is done" and the GP says "The isn't my bailiwick, see the surgeon".<_<
Yeah, I hate going to Los Angeles and seeing all the before and after billboards for surgery (usually for lap band, but...). It's a real money maker, especially when you add the highly probable cholecystectomy afterwards. And doing unnecessary ones (cosmetic and due to neurotic body image troubles) can often have a very "easy" pt on the table, not as large.
I've had to case manage a number of cases where the pt was never a good candidate (alcoholics?) and tried to get around the surgery by, say, eating mashed potatoes with lots of fluids (that one dehisced and took pain meds for the bellyache...) or drinking beer the carbonation had been shaken out of (sayWHAT?:wacko

.
Ask some questions, like "How long after surgery can a pt [or why can't a patient] resume taking NSAIDS?" or "Why do some patients get dumping syndrome, some apparently don't, and most who do get it sporadically?", and the answer is usually tap-dancing or a stare. Not their job.
But EMS, as evidenced by some of the responses so far, is NOT prepared for some of the niceties and potential pitfalls of treating such patients.
Ten thousand more a year.