Community Leader Election

Your three votes for Community Leaders

  • Aidey

    Votes: 32 48.5%

  • Akulahawk

    Votes: 20 30.3%

  • emt.dan

    Votes: 14 21.2%

  • Epi-do

    Votes: 20 30.3%

  • firefite

    Votes: 25 37.9%

  • n7lxi

    Votes: 39 59.1%

  • Tigger

    Votes: 27 40.9%
  • Total voters
    66
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
bigbaldguy said:
Having an opinion and being biased don't necessarily disqualify you, if it did no one on this forum would be qualified. Looking at the list I don't see anyone who wouldn't be a fair moderator. A big part of the reason we have multiple mods is so we act as a check and balance on each other. When I was a CL I had my decisions overturned multiple times as did all the other CLs. We all had our touchy topics that we would occasionally loose our objectivity on but when we did we would be ego checked pretty quickly.
Click to expand...

I thought it was so no one would know which one was firing a blank and which ones' bullets were real?
firing_squad_2.jpg

Kidding, kidding...
 
bigbaldguy said:
Having an opinion and being biased don't necessarily disqualify you, if it did no one on this forum would be qualified. Looking at the list I don't see anyone who wouldn't be a fair moderator. A big part of the reason we have multiple mods is so we act as a check and balance on each other. When I was a CL I had my decisions overturned multiple times as did all the other CLs. We all had our touchy topics that we would occasionally loose our objectivity on but when we did we would be ego checked pretty quickly.
Click to expand...

I disagree with them being able to start ignoring the extreme bias they show in their contempt for those that do not agree with them. If enough of them are CL's they will be able to push their opinions rather than fairly moderating. Not enough checks and balances here.
 
medic417 said:
I disagree with them being able to start ignoring the extreme bias they show in their contempt for those that do not agree with them. If enough of them are CL's they will be able to push their opinions rather than fairly moderating. Not enough checks and balances here.
Click to expand...

That is the dumbest idea I've ever heard and I disagree with it. J/k

Do you have a suggestion on a better system? While I'll be the first to admit the current system has flaws it actually functions very well behind the scenes. Feelings do occasionally get hurt but generally no one walks away bleeding. It's also important to remember that the rank and file members do have a check and balance power here. You might call it the ultimate check and balance because if the CLs ever got overly strict or overly lenient members simply vote with their feet. Make no mistake the CLs notice when the regulars stop checking in and they notice when new members don't stick around.

One last thing to keep in mind is that while this site appears to be run as a kind of bureaucracy it's really more of a benevolent dictatorship. Final authority rests with Matt and he has a vision for EMTLIFE and is very protective of the site. The site stays primarily neutral because Matt is very good at staying neutral and the CLs follow his lead. The sheer amount of grief I've seen Matt endure without loosing his objectivity is humbling. While Matt gives the CLs a great deal of independence and is great about soliciting and accepting input from the CLs make no mistake he keeps a very close eye on this place. So long as Matt is in charge of this site it will stay as open and neutral as it reasonably can be and Matt ain't going anywhere.

Of course if all else fails I'll just have to come out of retirement and straighten things out in the traditional CL style. Gypsy knife fight with fiddle music in the CL break room.
 
bigbaldguy said:
A big part of the reason we have multiple mods is so we act as a check and balance on each other. When I was a CL I had my decisions overturned multiple times as did all the other CLs. We all had our touchy topics that we would occasionally loose our objectivity on but when we did we would be ego checked pretty quickly.
Click to expand...

But what happens when even the CL's get a warning then does it go up to MMIZ or do y'all try to work it out in your private forum?
 
Achilles said:
But what happens when even the CL's get a warning then does it go up to MMIZ or do y'all try to work it out in your private forum?
Click to expand...

Every warning and infraction issued by any CL is automatically reviewed by the rest of us. If we disagree with it, we will reverse it.
 
ffemt8978 said:
Every warning and infraction issued by any CL is automatically reviewed by the rest of us. If we disagree with it, we will reverse it.
Click to expand...

How about Bans?
 
Achilles said:
So the 50+ spammers that you ban every day; you all talk about why the spammer should or should not be banned?
Click to expand...

Spammers are a different situation, and they are banned on sight.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
bigbaldguy said:
Having an opinion and being biased don't necessarily disqualify you, if it did no one on this forum would be qualified. Looking at the list I don't see anyone who wouldn't be a fair moderator. A big part of the reason we have multiple mods is so we act as a check and balance on each other. When I was a CL I had my decisions overturned multiple times as did all the other CLs. We all had our touchy topics that we would occasionally loose our objectivity on but when we did we would be ego checked pretty quickly.
Click to expand...


...and I've been told that the rule was that no mod could overrule another mod. Sure, if a mod could be persuaded to overturn an infraction, then fine. However it was always in the hands of the issuing moderator. Of course I will note that both times change.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
JPINFV said:
...and I've been told that the rule was that no mod could overrule another mod. Sure, if a mod could be persuaded to overturn an infraction, then fine. However it was always in the hands of the issuing moderator. Of course I will note that both times change.
Click to expand...

That has changed based upon past experiences. Any of us can overturn a warning/infraction/ban, but by policy we will not do it unless the majority of us agree it needs to be done.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If firefite does not win a CL spot, I am gonna demand a recount of the votes.
 
JDub said:
If firefite does not win a CL spot, I am gonna demand a recount of the votes.
Click to expand...

The results that you see in the poll will not be the final results. Some votes will be discarded because members voted for more than three candidates.
 
ffemt8978 said:
The results that you see in the poll will not be the final results. Some votes will be discarded because members voted for more than three candidates.
Click to expand...

Really? Like whom?
 
Achilles said:
Really? Like whom?
Click to expand...

You would be amazed at how hard it is for people to follow a simple set of directions. Wait scratch that you're in EMS that should have been day one learning.
 
Wait... it wasn't "vote for at least two of the following?"

I'm happy I stayed with 3 people then.
 
JDub said:
If firefite does not win a CL spot, I am gonna demand a recount of the votes.
Click to expand...

Personally I can't stand that firefite guy. Complete a$$hole :rofl:
 
JPINFV said:
Wait... it wasn't "vote for at least two of the following?"

I'm happy I stayed with 3 people then.
Click to expand...

Well actually it originally said "vote for firefite and then 2 others". I guess the CLs decided to give everyone a chance haha
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top