83 y/o N/V + Fever

Clipper1

Forum Asst. Chief
521
1
0
The patient had a DNR on the physician orders paperwork. Not a normal kind of DNR w/ two physician signatures where it shows what they would or would not like done. Families need to be made aware and nursing home staff aware that these exist/

Those orders need to be clarified at the facility. Most facilities have their own forms. But, this should have been done and you need to be checking with the nurse.
 

Rialaigh

Forum Asst. Chief
592
16
18
You have just confirmed why patients, families, DPOAs and physicians are reluctant to sign off on DNRs. They fear the DNR will be interpreted as Do Not Treat and the patient will suffer needlessly.

You have no definitive diagnostic data to base your decision. You are also asking the family or DPOA to call it quits for something which could easily be treated and the patient returned to baseline within 24 hours. This is not a "general feeling" but a decision which could end this person's life early for a treatable cause. You are also making the family make a decision for not doing medical treatment which they probably have never heard of like CPAP. They are not physicians and do not know if antibiotics and fluids would help especially if there is no lab work or other diagnostics to back up this decision. This is not an informed decision and the patient's heart has not stopped. With your phone call you are probably directing them to make decisions based solely on your own personal feelings and not the appropriate medical information. You may have hated all of those nursing home calls and now is your opportunity for a little "mercy" life ending or whatever you might prefer to call it. You need to defer to a physician and treat the patient appropriately along with not wasting time.

I am also going to suggest you take a geriatric medical emergencies class to learn more about how the most common illnesses can present poorly in the elderly but also can be easily treat.


Families pretty well know if they want a loved one on a breathing machine of any kind. The only other thing in question here is field pressors, with an average transport time of 25 minutes I doubt I would hang these period because it will take that long to find out if the patient is responsive to fluid therapy. Based on current BP it is not even an issue.

Whether the patient is a DNR or not has nothing to do with the fact that we are supposed to treat patients according to their wishes. And if they are unable to make a medical decision then according to the wishes of the POA or next of kin (if no POA). This person could be 30 years old with no previous medical problems, and if he is unable to make a medical decision and the POA does not want a breathing machine used or a tube placed...then it is my moral and legal responsibility to NOT do it.

I am not asking this family to make a decision based on my feelings, I am asking them to make a decision based on their feelings. As far as saying there is no definitive diagnostic data...well...if you think a lactate is the end all then...start treating based on numbers and not patient presentation I guess..



Stop treating patients that DON'T want to be treated....there are way more of them out there than you would think...
 

VFlutter

Flight Nurse
3,728
1,264
113
Stop treating patients that DON'T want to be treated....there are way more of them out there than you would think...

Then they should have never called EMS.
 

NomadicMedic

I know a guy who knows a guy.
12,098
6,845
113
Let's get back on topic. This is a scenario post, not a debate on DNR patients. It's a good discussion, but one that should continue in another thread.
 

Handsome Robb

Youngin'
Premium Member
9,736
1,173
113
The POA is always contacted by the sending facility and then again by the rec'g facility.

You are asking the POA to make a decision based solely on your assumptions and personal feelings without any data other than vitals to back it up and those vital signs could be from many other things.


A patient also has the right to be treated. They did not sign away their right to be treated by signing a DNR. After reading this discussion, people probably should be afraid to sign a DNR. Patients have the right to not suffer needlessly and they have the right adequate medical treatment by the appropriate providers.

You do not violate a DNR by treating a patient who still has a heartbeat. DNR does not mean DO NOT TREAT.

Really?

A patient like this that comes into the ER is going to get managed very conservatively until they get a hold of the POA and find out what they want. Do you really think an ER is going to go blasting away with imaging, diagnostics and lab studies on a patient like this without confirming that's what the family wants? There's a reason they go straight to the phone. How are we, as medical providers, any different?

Also seeing as they generally make that phone call early on what do you think the doctor is basing their info that they're giving the family member off? Oh yea...vitals, HPI and a detailed physical exam.

Edit: sorry, just saw that last post...oops lol
 
Last edited by a moderator:

mycrofft

Still crazy but elsewhere
11,322
48
48
83 y/o N/V + Fever​


I wanted to get some feedback and see how other might treat this patient I had. You are dispatched to a local nursing home for above complaint.

Pt in a DNR

You arrive and obtain the following vitals:

Staff report temp 102.2 axillary, 88% SPo2 room air
pt baseline gcs 9, non verbal
monitor shows sinus tach 130
SPo2 77% on room air, 38RR
skin hot to touch
146/86 b/p
120cbg
L/S rhonchi b/l
red rash noted in a few spots on the legs and chest, staff report this has been there for two days.

In route patient has PSVT with rates as high as 180 and back down to 100 and runs of vtach.

How would you treat this patient?

1. What specifically was on the "DNR"? No IV, no oxygen, no resuscitation, no transport? No what?

2. Was rash blanchable? Had the family taken the pt's temp lately? (Oddly, you could have them do it as laypersons if you aren't allowed to as an EMT, just attribute it to them).

3. How about EKG, oxygen per tolerated device, transport while clarifying this "DNR" situation? (25 min and a cell phone….what luxury).

4. If some treatment modes are revealed as ok to do, and the remaining time doesn't obviate them, then do them per protocols.

There are three concerns here. 1. What's wrong (directs tx and maybe communicable disease concerns ). 2. What can I legally and ethically do IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE? (directs tx and as a legal defense). 3. In the time given, can you make a difference or are you just satisfying your need to perform your skills?
 

Handsome Robb

Youngin'
Premium Member
9,736
1,173
113
Personally the only thing in this specific scenario that I see that could mess with the DNR order is pressors or intubation. Depending on how it's worded an argument could be made against C/BiPAP because it could be considered mechanical ventilation.

The EMS management of this patient isn't going to change unless they decide that they don't want the patient transported or you have a very long transport time.

There is no reason you can't place a NRB, get a line, start fluids and package the patient while you work on contacting the POA. How is that lazy or subpar care? Please explain that to me. This is an "ALS" transport if hey decide they don't want us to do anything and just transport or if they say they want you to do everything. It's my call, I do not care if I sit and chart or if I aggressively treat the patient. Honestly I'd prefer the latter. I hate sitting in the back with a patient that is sick and suffering and not being able to do anything to help them.

Something to address the allergic reaction. It's not uncommon for these patients to have Benedryl prescribed to the PRN for itching or rashes so if you want to treat the rash with IV Benedryl and have a protocol to do so there's no issue there. Even if they don't have an Rx for it I don't have an issue treating it, provided you can support an allergic reaction what says you can't give it under your protocol? After all everyone in here seems to think we think DNR means do not treat... :rolleyes:
 

FLdoc2011

Forum Captain
313
23
18
Really?

A patient like this that comes into the ER is going to get managed very conservatively until they get a hold of the POA and find out what they want. Do you really think an ER is going to go blasting away with imaging, diagnostics and lab studies on a patient like this without confirming that's what the family wants? There's a reason they go straight to the phone. How are we, as medical providers, any different?

Also seeing as they generally make that phone call early on what do you think the doctor is basing their info that they're giving the family member off? Oh yea...vitals, HPI and a detailed physical exam.

Actually a patient like this that comes into the ER is going to get treated aggressively at first unless someone comes along and the patient is either made CMO or the POA states they don't want a certain intervention. An unstable patient is going to be treated first before the physician takes their time to find some family member and talk them through the different options.

In short, they're going to err on the side of treating that patient instead assuming anything. The liability otherwise is too great.

Same thing when I'm dealing with someone crashing in the ICU, unless they are CMO or I know beforehand specific wishes I have to be aggressive with them until I hear otherwise. As soon as I'm able of course I'm going to get in touch with someone to see how much they want done but it won't be at the sake of waiting to intervene on a crashing patient.
 

Handsome Robb

Youngin'
Premium Member
9,736
1,173
113
Actually a patient like this that comes into the ER is going to get treated aggressively at first unless someone comes along and the patient is either made CMO or the POA states they don't want a certain intervention. An unstable patient is going to be treated first before the physician takes their time to find some family member and talk them through the different options.

In short, they're going to err on the side of treating that patient instead assuming anything. The liability otherwise is too great.

Same thing when I'm dealing with someone crashing in the ICU, unless they are CMO or I know beforehand specific wishes I have to be aggressive with them until I hear otherwise. As soon as I'm able of course I'm going to get in touch with someone to see how much they want done but it won't be at the sake of waiting to intervene on a crashing patient.

I'm not saying that the ER does nothing, I guess I didn't communicate that well.

Every single time I've brought a patient, who has a DNR that isn't specific to what is and is not allowed, that's hemodynamically unstable into the ER the ERP starts treating while the case manager works on making contact with the POA. They're not going straight to intubation, central lines, pressors, they're starting early goal directed therapy in the least invasive way possible. Drawing labs, maybe NIPPV if it's indicated, a second line, imaging. Things like that. Hell they might even start antibiotics, I'm not sure.

I've not once seen anyone say write this person off, don't treat them, they're dead.
 

FLdoc2011

Forum Captain
313
23
18
I'm not saying that the ER does nothing, I guess I didn't communicate that well.

Every single time I've brought a patient, who has a DNR that isn't specific to what is and is not allowed, that's hemodynamically unstable into the ER the ERP starts treating while the case manager works on making contact with the POA. They're not going straight to intubation, central lines, pressors, they're starting early goal directed therapy in the least invasive way possible. Drawing labs, maybe NIPPV if it's indicated, a second line, imaging. Things like that. Hell they might even start antibiotics, I'm not sure.

I've not once seen anyone say write this person off, don't treat them, they're dead.

Yea obviously intubation is off the table with the DNR known but everything else really isn't different from how they'd approach and treat someone who came in with a similar presentation but no DNR. Even in those situations central lines and pressors aren't immediately started until at least some basic work up. My point is mainly this guy being a DNR, besides obviously being a "no code" and no intubation, doesn't really change how he should be approached from an initial treatment perspective. For the most part it's not going to change how I work him up or my initial management. Even a central line or bipap is not off the table.
 

FLdoc2011

Forum Captain
313
23
18
And definitely wasn't saying or implying that you were saying do not treat. Just speaking to you saying how this patient would be initially treated conservatively in the ED. In my opinion this person is treated no different from any other person who comes in with a similar picture, except for intubation or running a code.

We may have different definitions of "conservative" care as well.
 

triemal04

Forum Deputy Chief
1,582
245
63
Then they should have never called EMS.
\
I can't believe you actually said that. Unless...you're joking, right? I mean, there had to be heavy sarcasm there that just isn't coming across.

How about this for everyone? This is a fairly standard POLST that is used in several states in very similar versions. Please read the ENTIRE form before going on.
https://www.wsma.org/Media/Patients-pdfs/POLST-PrintDownload.pdf

If the OP's patient had declared themself a "DNR with comfort measures only" and had decided against antibiotics and tube feeding...how exactly would he be treated?
 
OP
OP
rhan101277

rhan101277

Forum Deputy Chief
1,224
2
36
83 y/o N/V + Fever​




1. What specifically was on the "DNR"? No IV, no oxygen, no resuscitation, no transport? No what?

2. Was rash blanchable? Had the family taken the pt's temp lately? (Oddly, you could have them do it as laypersons if you aren't allowed to as an EMT, just attribute it to them).

3. How about EKG, oxygen per tolerated device, transport while clarifying this "DNR" situation? (25 min and a cell phone….what luxury).

4. If some treatment modes are revealed as ok to do, and the remaining time doesn't obviate them, then do them per protocols.

There are three concerns here. 1. What's wrong (directs tx and maybe communicable disease concerns ). 2. What can I legally and ethically do IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE? (directs tx and as a legal defense). 3. In the time given, can you make a difference or are you just satisfying your need to perform your skills?

This was a DNR on a physicians order sheet not a standard DNR where items they want or don't want done are checked. If it is on a order sheet I am going to honor it after I verify w/ staff.
 

Clipper1

Forum Asst. Chief
521
1
0
\

If the OP's patient had declared themself a "DNR with comfort measures only" and had decided against antibiotics and tube feeding...how exactly would he be treated?

The scenario was not "with comfort measures".

Pt in a DNR

But, if it had been "with comfort measures only" I would hope you would treat this patient with comfort measures which includes pain medications and oxygen if that is what the situation calls for clinical signs which means more than just an SpO2 check. If your protocols allow for nebulizing fentanyl or morphine that is also an option for a patient expressing shortness of breath.
 

VFlutter

Flight Nurse
3,728
1,264
113
\
I can't believe you actually said that. Unless...you're joking, right? I mean, there had to be heavy sarcasm there that just isn't coming across.

How about this for everyone? This is a fairly standard POLST that is used in several states in very similar versions. Please read the ENTIRE form before going on.
https://www.wsma.org/Media/Patients-pdfs/POLST-PrintDownload.pdf

If the OP's patient had declared themself a "DNR with comfort measures only" and had decided against antibiotics and tube feeding...how exactly would he be treated?

No, I am not joking. That was a response to the comment...
Stop treating patients that DON'T want to be treated....there are way more of them out there than you would think...

If the patient and/or patient's family truly does not want treatment as in "Comfort Measures Only" then they should not be calling EMS and certainly not be transporting to the hospital. Most of these type of patients have home health and hospice care. There is nothing we should be doing for these patients, even IV fluids are prolonging the dying process.

However If the patient just has a DNR that is not specific other than no CPR/Intubation then by all means call 911 and transport. My treatment for that patient is no different than a full code patient. I do not assume that a DNR patient wants as little done as possible, as he implied. I assume the opposite, that they want aggressive treatment up until the point of cardiac arrest and want all reasonable interventions to prevent a cardiac arrest.

I will try to scan a copy of our DNR order form. The wording is similar to what I just described "Aggressive treatment will be provided...".


If the OP's patient had declared themself a "DNR with comfort measures only" and had decided against antibiotics and tube feeding...how exactly would he be treated?

They should not be treated nor transported. They should be given their comfort medications and that is it. What do you think we are going to do for them when they get to the hospital?
 

Clipper1

Forum Asst. Chief
521
1
0
They should not be treated nor transported. They should be given their comfort medications and that is it. What do you think we are going to do for them when they get to the hospital?

That would depend on the reason called. Some cancer and AIDS patients are in hospice for comfort care but still get a limited amount of treatment such as replacing an infected port or PICC or even foley which could be causing discomfort. The idea is for "comfort" throughout the dying process and not to allow what can easily be corrected to cause more discomfort.

But, I agree if the family called 911 they may have a good reason and a family member can fight a DNR. Sometimes they are the DPOA and sometimes they are not. This is why we have Ethics Committees and Physicians with legal advisors on call.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

VFlutter

Flight Nurse
3,728
1,264
113
That would depend on the reason called. Some cancer and AIDS patients are in hospice for comfort care but still get a limited amount of treatment such as replacing an infected port or PICC or even foley which could be causing discomfort. The idea is for "comfort" throughout the dying process and not to allow what can easily be corrected to cause more discomfort.

Agreed but does that require an ER visit or hospital stay? (Aside from the PICC/Port) If the patient has absolutely no assistance then sure but the majority of these patients, if not in a LTAC or SNF, will have some type of home health care. It can, and should, be handled outside of the acute care setting.
 

Clipper1

Forum Asst. Chief
521
1
0
Agreed but does that require an ER visit or hospital stay? (Aside from the PICC/Port) If the patient has absolutely no assistance then sure but the majority of these patients, if not in a LTAC or SNF, will have some type of home health care. It can, and should, be handled outside of the acute care setting.

True but not all patients follow a recipe. Other body parts can break either bones (not necessarily from falling) or become diseased. We had one teenager at the beginning of hospice care who got a very painful tooth abscess which required extraction in the hospital. Another got appendicitis which really presented a dilemma.

This is a great discussion topic which I would be willing to continue on a nursing forum with you and others.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

triemal04

Forum Deputy Chief
1,582
245
63
No, I am not joking. That was a response to the comment...

If the patient and/or patient's family truly does not want treatment as in "Comfort Measures Only" then they should not be calling EMS and certainly not be transporting to the hospital.
I don't mean to be rude, but you clearly do not understand why people call 911, who is calling, or what type of "comfort care" may be needed. Many people call because they aren't sure of what to do, are panicking, don't know what the actual patient wants, or because they are required to (for someone living in an assisted-living center for instance). While the actual patient may not want care, (or even need care in some cases) the simple fact that 911 was called does not in any way, shape, or form mean that they have consented to treatement. Rialagh is very right; we need to stop treating people who don't want treatement.

This of course ignores the fact that "comfort care" is very much something that we can provide to many patients, and should when appropriate. Sometimes this very well may mean that the patient is taken to the hospital.


Most of these type of patients have home health and hospice care.
I'm sorry, but this is patently, and blatantly false. Many, many, many people have a DNR with comfort measures only and are leading normal lives without any sort of hospice or in home care, nor do they need that type of care. They simply know that they want to die peacefully and naturally when it happens. As is very much their right.

I will try to scan a copy of our DNR order form. The wording is similar to what I just described "Aggressive treatment will be provided...".
Please do. I would be very interested to read the entire thing.
 

VFlutter

Flight Nurse
3,728
1,264
113
I'm sorry, but this is patently, and blatantly false. Many, many, many people have a DNR with comfort measures only and are leading normal lives without any sort of hospice or in home care, nor do they need that type of care. They simply know that they want to die peacefully and naturally when it happens. As is very much their right.

Many, Many, Many people? Maybe it is more prevalent in your area however I have never seen a single patient come in with a "Comfort Measures Only" DNR that was leading anything close to a "normal life". I have seen many people who have DNRs that come in who are quite independent and relatively healthy, but we are talking about two totally different things. I have also never discharged a patient home on comfort measures without some type of in-home care. Which I do on a weekly basis with many of our end stage patients.

By the definition of "Comfort Measure Only" DNRs it declines any life prolonging treatments. They will not receive IV fluids, IV abx, or any form of treatment other than pain/anxiety/etc. In reality they are sent to the lowest level of care bed available and either die or get discharged back to where they came from.

I do not know many people who are living normal lives who choose to die from a UTI or would refuse treatment for an allergic reaction. But obviously it seems that you know more than I do.
 
Top