the 100% directionless thread

CALEMT

The Other Guy/ Paramaybe?
4,524
3,349
113
Yu mad @VentMonkey? Sorry had to, better luck next year. Cool to see Houston pull it off considering a hurricane demolished the city.
 

VentMonkey

Family Guy
5,729
5,043
113
Congratulations Houston Astros!
#HoustonStrong
Great Series, good for them, that said...
22F2E28F-3DFA-42F2-8D47-8300BFA20D96.jpeg

Tried and true, I still bleed blue.

#DemBumsin2018
 

PotatoMedic

Has no idea what I'm doing.
2,706
1,549
113
Any chance we can get the rsi topic broken off into a thread called "The Great RSI Debate"? It's too linear for the 100% directionless thread.
 

VFlutter

Flight Nurse
3,728
1,264
113
So I guess someone order the 10g NAR decompression needles instead of the 14g. Looked like I was ramming a railroad spike in some poor old lady’s chest. Worked like a champ tho. Tracheobronchial rupture ain’t no joke.

Here is a fun scenario. Patient has a Trachenobroncial injury to the right bronchus. Can’t see anything distal to the right mainstem bronchus on CT. Right Tension Pnuemothroax with massive tracheal deviation to the left. You need to intubate, what to do you with the tube? Try to blindly left mainstem it? Bury it to the hub and hope you are distal to the injury? Will that make the issue worse?
 

Carlos Danger

Forum Deputy Chief
Premium Member
4,513
3,241
113
So I guess someone order the 10g NAR decompression needles instead of the 14g. Looked like I was ramming a railroad spike in some poor old lady’s chest. Worked like a champ tho. Tracheobronchial rupture ain’t no joke.

Here is a fun scenario. Patient has a Trachenobroncial injury to the right bronchus. Can’t see anything distal to the right mainstem bronchus on CT. Right Tension Pnuemothroax with massive tracheal deviation to the left. You need to intubate, what to do you with the tube? Try to blindly left mainstem it? Bury it to the hub and hope you are distal to the injury? Will that make the issue worse?

Man that is a tough one. Decompress and then try to intubate the left side, I guess. You can do it with a regular ETT, though it is probably much easier with a DLT. I'm sure @E tank has much more experience with that than I do.
 

GMCmedic

Forum Deputy Chief
1,640
1,056
113
So I guess someone order the 10g NAR decompression needles instead of the 14g. Looked like I was ramming a railroad spike in some poor old lady’s chest. Worked like a champ tho. Tracheobronchial rupture ain’t no joke.

Here is a fun scenario. Patient has a Trachenobroncial injury to the right bronchus. Can’t see anything distal to the right mainstem bronchus on CT. Right Tension Pnuemothroax with massive tracheal deviation to the left. You need to intubate, what to do you with the tube? Try to blindly left mainstem it? Bury it to the hub and hope you are distal to the injury? Will that make the issue worse?
I want nothing to do with that.

Couldn't the left subsequently collapse also with a right mainstem intubation?
 

Chris07

Competent in Incompetence
342
62
28
Question to all you medics:

Has any of you ever seen Electrical Alternans in a patient?

The amount of pericardial effusion required to literally allow the heart to swing back and forth within the pericardial sac seems like it would make it a relatively uncommon.


Edit: I’d imagine that an ultrasound finding like below would not be common and is probably an extreme example. That’s a lot of fluid!

 
Last edited:

StCEMT

Forum Deputy Chief
3,052
1,709
113
Question to all you medics:

Has any of you ever seen Electrical Alternans in a patient?

The amount of pericardial effusion required to literally allow the heart to swing back and forth within the pericardial sac seems like it would make it a relatively uncommon.
I think I might have as a student, but I honestly don't remember with 100% certainty.
 

Chris07

Competent in Incompetence
342
62
28
I updated my post. Get the needle out. Time to do a little pericardiocentesis.
 

VFlutter

Flight Nurse
3,728
1,264
113
Question to all you medics:

Has any of you ever seen Electrical Alternans in a patient?

The amount of pericardial effusion required to literally allow the heart to swing back and forth within the pericardial sac seems like it would make it a relatively uncommon.

I’ve seen it a few times in the ICU. Pulsus paradoxus is more commonly noticed. Usually it is seen in patients with a large slowly forming pericardial effusion most commonly with malignancy. Those who acutely develop a large enough effusion to cause Electrical Alterans die shortly there after.
 

Chris07

Competent in Incompetence
342
62
28
I’ve seen it a few times in the ICU. Pulsus paradoxus is more commonly noticed. Usually it is seen in patients with a large slowly forming pericardial effusion most commonly with malignancy. Those who acutely develop a large enough effusion to cause Electrical Alterans die shortly there after.

Yea. In a clinical simulation we had a patient who was a cancer patient with gradually worsening SOB x2 weeks with wheezing. So malignant pericardial effusion is the likely cause.

While the pericardium is pretty stiff, I’d imagine that if fluid leakage into the pericardium was gradual enough, the pericardium would have some degree of compliance and stretch a bit. Going from zero to full bore quickly is just going to crush the heart immediately.
 

VFlutter

Flight Nurse
3,728
1,264
113
While the pericardium is pretty stiff, I’d imagine that if fluid leakage into the pericardium was gradual enough, the pericardium would have some degree of compliance and stretch a bit. Going from zero to full bore quickly is just going to crush the heart immediately.

It’s all about volume vs time. A relatively small increase in pericardial volume abruptly, something like 100ml, can cause Tamponade and a slowly accumulating effusion can be something crazy like 1000ml before causing hemodynamic compromise. Also depends on the compliance of the pericardium. Stiff, I.e pericarditis, with effusion is bad.
 

E tank

Caution: Paralyzing Agent
1,581
1,430
113
Man that is a tough one. Decompress and then try to intubate the left side, I guess. You can do it with a regular ETT, though it is probably much easier with a DLT. I'm sure @E tank has much more experience with that than I do.

Yeah...no...any pathology like that makes even a DLT really hard, and thats with a fiber optic bronchoscope. Without a FOB, chest tube, normal intubation just past cords, place patient on left side and get to the OR.
 

VFlutter

Flight Nurse
3,728
1,264
113
Yeah...no...any pathology like that makes even a DLT really hard, and thats with a fiber optic bronchoscope. Without a FOB, chest tube, normal intubation just past cords, place patient on left side and get to the OR.

Pretty much what we did. Attempted to blindly intubate the left which wasn’t going to happen given the amount of deviation and then just left it at the normal depth and rapid transport to the trauma center for a fiberoptic bronch and chest tube. Had to decompress a couple times. If she coded I would have maybe just buried it to the hub to try to pass the injury.
 
Top