"What's in a name?" Dr. Bledsoe's article

VentMedic

Forum Chief
Messages
5,923
Reaction score
1
Points
0
What's in a name?
June 22, 2009
http://www.ems1.com/Columnists/bryan-bledsoe/articles/504848-Whats-in-a-name
EMS has an identity problem. The public is often unsure of our education, roles, and capabilities. In fact, many EMS providers are unsure about who does what in the industry because certification levels often vary from state to state. Is part of the problem in the names we have chosen? As EMS has developed, government leaders and others have chosen the term "emergency medical technician (EMT)" to describe EMS workers. Around the same time, in certain regions of the country (particularly the West coast) the term "paramedic" became the moniker of choice used to describe emergency medical providers.
Over a year ago, I watched a video produced by Acadian Ambulance where it proposed that all EMS providers be called "medics" based on the history of medics in the military. While I don’t think "medic" is the proper word, perhaps "paramedic" is. The new scope of practice has four recognized levels: Emergency Medical Responder (EMR), Emergency Medical Technician (EMT), Advanced Emergency Medical Technician (AEMT), and Paramedic (EMTP). For simplicity, let’s call the Emergency Medical Responder "First Responder" or "Emergency Medical Responder," but call everyone else a "paramedic." This seems to be the model that the public accepts. Nurses are called "nurses" despite the fact that there are two levels of nurses (registered nurses and licensed practical or vocational nurses). Firefighters are called "firefighters" despite varying levels of certification and education. Police officers are called "police officers" (or cops) despite the fact that there are varying levels of certification.

http://www.ems1.com/Columnists/bryan-bledsoe/articles/504848-Whats-in-a-name

Whether you are an EMT, paramedic, firefighter, or private-based provider, you are still an EMS professional. It makes little difference whether you climbed down from a fire engine or exited an ambulance. You and your colleagues share a common goal and role with other EMS providers — providing quality patient care.

Along the same lines, EMS needs to get away from this idea of Basic Life Support (BLS) versus Advanced Life Support (ALS). Every level of EMS provider primarily provides BLS.
 
BLS vs ALS is a big difference. A good portion of calls are ALS aorund where I live. Can't see where he's going with that last quote.


Agreed thought that the wording is confusing. Some friends (not in EMS) call me a paramedic and I've just stopped correcting them. I've had an ER Doc (who was a professor of a class I was taking) introduce me to someone as his student in the classroom, but also a paramedic in the real world.

Calling everyone a paramedic would solve the issue for the layperson, but how do we differentiate between them on a professional level? Instead of EMT-B, -I, -P should we go with Paramedic-1, Paramedic-2, Paramedic-3?

That would allow us to call everyone a medic for the soundbyte on the 6 o'clock news, and allow us to distinguish professionally the difference? We could still keep truck names the same under this system with Squads, Advanceds, and Medics respectively. Although i've always hated the Advanced designation, it makes it sound more advanced than the medic. Also on the fireground it causes a lot of confusion.
"Advanced 99 on the scene." Advanced what? Is the truck with the bigger ladder here? Is the Assistant Chief here?
 
WuLabsWuTecH

Does every single patient, or even 51% of them, get an IV or intubated? Or do most get basic interventions?



That's what he means.
 
Bledsoe struck a nerve, pointless juvenile bickering on EMS social networking websites? I would like to think that we are not children fighting over silly edumacation. I would like to think that some of us are effective EMS advocates who will not let their guard down against EMTs who push for lowering educational standards.
 
WuLabsWuTecH

Does every single patient, or even 51% of them, get an IV or intubated? Or do most get basic interventions?



That's what he means.

I took it as a move to eliminate confusing levels and have everyone just "provide" the same consistent level of care. No differentiated basic life support or advanced life support, just life support across the board.

But, eh, I could be reading too far into it, haven't read the article yet, just scanned the quotes.
 
In terms of eliminating "BLS and ALS," I think he's getting at the use of BLS and ALS to characterize interventions into two seperate groups.
 
I see his point with respect that both RNs and LVNs are called nurses, but the difference in their education is about a year, and LVN cannot be obtained in 2 weeks like EMT.

Having an 2 week wonder EMT called a paramedic after I will have worked 13 months plus pre reqs for the title annoys me. Call it juvenile if you will, but doctors are having the same debate about NPs being called doctor, so I see this debate on both sides.
 
Call it juvenile if you will, but doctors are having the same debate about NPs being called doctor, so I see this debate on both sides.

Ohhh please don't start that again.
 
I see his point with respect that both RNs and LVNs are called nurses, but the difference in their education is about a year, and LVN cannot be obtained in 2 weeks like EMT.

Having an 2 week wonder EMT called a paramedic after I will have worked 13 months plus pre reqs for the title annoys me. Call it juvenile if you will, but doctors are having the same debate about NPs being called doctor, so I see this debate on both sides.

Kind of high-horse, isn't it?


Difference between a fast track EMT and fast track Medic is what, 20 weeks?

Heck, difference between a college EMT and college medic is still only a year. So why is it acceptable to you to call a LVn and RN both nurses, being a year apart, but EMT's can't be called medics, having even less time separation.
 
Oh yes, he wants to do that again.

Call it juvenile if you will, but doctors are having the same debate about NPs being called doctor, so I see this debate on both sides.

I will soon be able to use the term "doctor" in my title. We have professors, Physical Therapists and a whole host of other medical and non-medical people that use the term "doctor". Have you not ever been to a college and noticed the titles of the educators? Even in college EMS programs there is usually someone over the department that has a doctorate degree although it is usually a nurse.

The DNP has been around for almost 2 decades and it has not been an issue until a couple of doctors wrote an article once the NPs confirmed they were raising their entry level education. Out of the thousands of other doctors, this has not be a problem for them. In fact, most enjoy having those who work in their offices to have advanced education since it could only serve to improve patient care. Believe it or not that is the argument other healthcare professions have also used when petitioning for higher standards. They didn't say "cause we want more money". They said "as a profession we would like to be able to better serve the patients".

Maybe some should become familiar with the titles of higher education. As well, some should read about how other professions have advanced their education. NPs have been planning their next move since 2004 to take in effect 2015. RT did a 10 year plan for their Associates degree with 5 years to implement and 5 years to grandfather. They also have plans for the Bachelors degree and are awaiting a couple of Bills to pass in Washington, D.C. before they precede with the future. PT has made the Doctorate their recommended education for practice.​

In 2004, the American Association of Colleges of Nursing recommended a shift in preparing all advance practice nurses, including NPs, to the doctoral level by 2015 with the title of nursing practice or DNP.

http://www.aanp.org/NR/rdonlyres/59523729-0179-466A-A7FB-BDEE68160E8E/0/NPCurriculum.pdf

From the AANP website:

[FONT=TimesNewRoman,Bold][FONT=TimesNewRoman,Bold]Utilization of the Title "Doctor" by Nurse Practitioners[/FONT][/FONT]​

[FONT=TimesNewRoman,Bold]1. The title "Doctor" represents an academic credential, and is not limited to professional programs.
Graduate educational programs in colleges and universities in the United States confer academic degrees, which permit graduates to be called "doctor". No one discipline owns the title "doctor".

2. In the health care field, the term doctor is not limited to medical doctors. Other health care professions use their academic title: e.g. Doctor of Osteopathy, Doctor of Pharmacy, Doctor of Podiatry, Doctor of Psychology, Doctor of Physical Therapy and others.

3. While the titles "Medical Doctor" or "Doctor of Osteopathy" may be title protected by statute in a given state, the term "doctor" alone is not.

4. Recognition of the title, "Doctor", for doctorally prepared nurse practitioners facilitates parity within
the health care system.
[/FONT]

Just like the handful of doctors that took offense to nurses gaining another degree, EMS will meet the same opposition from others if they ever start to advance. EMS has already encountered these arguments and many have just taken the low road to education. Unfortunately most of the opposition has come from within EMS. There are perceived enemies of EMS providers in other healthcare professions but much of that is a myth.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
While I don't agree with everything said in Dr Bledsoe's article I do think he made some really good points. EMS has way too many certification titles and provider levels. While I don't agree calling everyone a Paramedic is the correct approach, some sort of National standard should be adopted.

Daedalus, how long have you been an EMT yourself? Have you paid your dues in EMS? Ever spent holiday's away from your family providing coverage for your community? Or missed meals with your family because a EMS call came in?
 
This is an interesting quote from one of the posters below the article at

http://www.ems1.com/Columnists/bryan-bledsoe/articles/504848-Whats-in-a-name

Abraham Lincoln is quoted as asking, "If you call his tail a leg, how many legs does a dog have?" The answer is, of course, four, because simply calling a tail a leg does not make it a leg. Likewise, changing the names of our lowest common denominator does nothing to actually raise that lowest common denominator. And if we are doing nothing to actually improve anything, what is the point? Why -- with all of the forty year-old problems facing EMS -- are we squabbling over semantics? This is akin to rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.
 
Vent and Sasha, this time, you are 180 degrees off. I said that even doctors have hissy fits over their titles. Did I say that I agreed with them?

In fact, Sasha will tell you that I have moved on from the DNP thing and have adopted a policy of live and let live. I have far to many things to worry about right now other than who is getting called doctor and who is not. As long as DNP schools push for more than 4 units of pathophysiology, fine.

However, to back up my statement that doctors are indeed fighting over the use of the word doctor, here is the American Medical Association statement on the issue. Like I have said, I have no opinion.
http://www.ama-assn.org/ama1/pub/upload/mm/471/303.doc

Where I live and work, you will be hard pressed to find a 20 week paramedic school. Questa College, NCTI Santa Barbara, and Ventura College are all year long programs and all three have transferrable college units recognized by the community college system. There is no comparison between an AS degreed paramedic and a two week first aid cert EMT. Sorry.
 
In fact, Sasha will tell you that I have moved on from the DNP thing and have adopted a policy of live and let live.

Actually, I wont. You are contradicting yourself all over the place!
 
While I don't agree with everything said in Dr Bledsoe's article I do think he made some really good points. EMS has way too many certification titles and provider levels. While I don't agree calling everyone a Paramedic is the correct approach, some sort of National standard should be adopted.

Daedalus, how long have you been an EMT yourself? Have you paid your dues in EMS? Ever spent holiday's away from your family providing coverage for your community? Or missed meals with your family because a EMS call came in?

Why may I ask are you calling for an inventory of my EMS experience? BTW, I do not miss meal with my family because I get a call. I am a paid EMT and therefore spend my shift at station, not at home.

I have multiple Christmas's, many birthdays and other family events. I have worked in Public Health for uninsured residents of my county for 5 years and EMS for 2 and a half.
 
BLS vs ALS is a big difference. A good portion of calls are ALS aorund where I live. Can't see where he's going with that last quote.

All good ALS begins with BLS, Is not the maintenence of Airway, Assistance of Breathing & Assistance in Circulation BLS BEFORE it becomes ALS? Airwaymaintenance through a simple jaw thrust, or an OPA can be effective, BVM is not an ALS skill, but is effective, CPR is not an ALS skill.



Agreed thought that the wording is confusing. Some friends (not in EMS) call me a paramedic and I've just stopped correcting them. I've had an ER Doc (who was a professor of a class I was taking) introduce me to someone as his student in the classroom, but also a paramedic in the real world.

Calling everyone a paramedic would solve the issue for the layperson, but how do we differentiate between them on a professional level? Instead of EMT-B, -I, -P should we go with Paramedic-1, Paramedic-2, Paramedic-3?

I think that the US needs to look at the definition of the term Paramedic in order to answer this bit. The Cambridge dictionary defines it as

paramedic Hide phonetics
noun [C]
a person who is trained to do medical work, especially in an emergency, but who is not a doctor or nurse

This is a universal name & just about every country other than the US has no difficulty with it.

Agreed thought that the wording is confusing. Some friends (not in EMS) call me a paramedic and I've just stopped correcting them. I've had an ER Doc (who was a professor of a class I was taking) introduce me to someone as his student in the classroom, but also a paramedic in the real world.

Calling everyone a paramedic would solve the issue for the layperson, but how do we differentiate between them on a professional level? Instead of EMT-B, -I, -P should we go with Paramedic-1, Paramedic-2, Paramedic-3?

There is also an option to further distinguish internally using these numbers. We have ICP, as well as ECP here, Intensive Care & Extended Care, but to the public, we are all the same.

That would allow us to call everyone a medic for the soundbyte on the 6 o'clock news, and allow us to distinguish professionally the difference? We could still keep truck names the same under this system with Squads, Advanceds, and Medics respectively. Although i've always hated the Advanced designation, it makes it sound more advanced than the medic. Also on the fireground it causes a lot of confusion.
"Advanced 99 on the scene." Advanced what? Is the truck with the bigger ladder here? Is the Assistant Chief here

Use car numbers that are unique. Who really cares?
 
Actually, I wont. You are contradicting yourself all over the place!

No, I haven't. I have said to you that I respect and admire the education process for RNs and NPs, because I have seen people I know go through it.

The only reason I mentioned the conflict between MDs and NPs is because I wanted to show that EMS is not the only profession fighting over titles. I will say it again, I do not mind who and who does not use the title "doctor" in the clinical setting. It does not concern me yet, as I have not advanced to that level and when I get there, I will have to see how I feel.

VentMedic is certainly entitled to use the title doctor, because in academia, a PhD is generally considered a higher doctorate than a first professional degree like an MD or DNP. It is a huge accomplishment and I would be the first to congratulate her.
 
Back
Top