So, given the fact that there are over 25,000 towns, villages, and cities in the US (
http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=509183)and that it would take approximately 3 medics per community to provide 24/7 ALS coverage at
one ambulance per community, that would mean we would need to have at least 75, 000 medics in the US alone.
Now consider that there are approximately 48,000 ambulances in the US (
http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview/id/784884.html), that means you would need approximately 125,000 to 150,000 medics to provide that coverage.
Can it be done? Yes. Should it be done? Yes. Will it be done? Probably not. Especially when you consider something like this:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2006-05-21-paramedics_x.htm
Please, please let's cite credible information. C'mon. Look at the citations. Zoll & Montgomery County EMS? Let's research through the State EMS Directors and see the numbers and what projection should be. Within the same Internet quotation there are 35k with monitors or AED and that leaves only 10,000 without them? B.S.! I am sure there more than 10K without AED or Monitors. Are they also including private ambulance or non-911 or multiple EMS within a city?
The USA today article that was cited was also taken way out of context. Something those involved with OKC & Tulsa (which is cited) still regrets. This is the reason they are service I was referring to that are paying salary for a person while attending school for their Paramedic. Even moving and recruiting bonuses are negotiated . More is less...I don't think so.
Now, figure this there is alone over 5,000 EMT's alone in my state and its a rural state. There are over 17,000* NREMT/P alone; this does not include those that are not Registered or involved as a NREMT.
Does this mean there is a shortage, you bet. Since there is; should we allow a compromise to short change our profession, the system, and worse patient care? There is far more a shortage of nurses as the average age of a RN is now 49*. Thus approximately over 15% will be retiring within the next ten years.. so we shall allow volunteer nurses aides to perform RN jobs. Yeah, I can see the nursing industry allowing that to happen. NOT.
The difference is they are a profession composed of professionals. They will not allow such compromises. They will not "dilute" their system or profession. Even the "crash courses and on-line" programs will be coming under more scrutiny and we will probably see less and less states allowing license from these. I know that my state alone has added additional requirements to ensure that the RN candidate has met the "minimal" safety requirements.
Ever seen who governs their profession? Nurses and no one else. Each state has a Governing Board. Now, compare that with EMS.
I wish EMS had the gonads to do such. Nope, we will develop some form of pseudo acronym or another excuse (we are good at that) to cover up the blunders. Public assume that because it has lights & sirens there is a Paramedic in it. We also make sure that they are unaware of this as well. Yeah, there is one thing we are good at... not educating the public and definitley not making them aware of the difference.
Maybe a new insignia should be incorporated with the Paramedic (without the EMT referrence) and marketed and publicized. If you don't see this, you don't have Paramedic. Hmmm.. wonder what the community perception would be?
R/r 911
* NREMT 2007 Fiscal Reports
** ANA 2008 Review