usafmedic45
Forum Deputy Chief
- 3,796
- 5
- 0
You're in luck....I happen to present on this subject at conferences.That's very, very interesting. I've always had my doubts about how much faster an air evac is... hmm....
Most studies show that in most areas going by air roughly doubles the time involved be it a flight from a scene or from a hospital. Outside of REALLY rural areas (where FFEMT8978 lives is a good example, although at 3.5 hrs hours by ground, you'd almost be better off with a fixed wing air ambulance because it's faster, easier to work in and a hell of a lot safer), offshore, combat, high rise rescue, etc you're better off going by ground.
Here's some of the science:
Snooks HA, Nicholl JP, Brazier JE, Lees-Mlanga S. The Costs and Benefits of Helicopter Emergency Services in England and Wales. J Pub Health Med. 1996;18:67
-Increase in scene times
-Increase in expenses to the patient/their insurer
-No improvement in response times
-Minimal benefit
Karanicolas PJ et al: The fastest route between two points is not always a straight line: an analysis of air and land transfer of non-penetrating trauma patients. J Trauma 2006; 61: 396-403
-Longer transfer times (41.3 vs 89.7 minutes)
-Actual transport time shorter by air (58.4 vs 78.9)
-Distance of transport is not a good indicator of how long the transfer will take
-Other studies show similar delays with scene responses (Ringburg AN et al, 2007)
“They can do more in the back of the helicopter”
“Working a critical patient on board any medical aircraft- especially a helicopter- is a lot like trying to work a code in a bathroom stall at a Deep Purple concert. You don’t have a lot of room to work, what little there is taken up by other people and you can’t hear anything over the din.”- Me
-Most advanced skills are done before departure
-Studies have shown that patients benefit from the availability of ALS not from the fact it came in the form of a helicopter (Hurola et al 2002)
“It’s in our dispatch criteria.”
“Mechanism of injury!”
CALLING FOR A HELICOPTER BECAUSE OF NON-PHYSIOLOGICAL “SIGNS OF TRAUMA” IS JUST AS UNJUSTIFIABLE.
You’re basically being told you should fly someone to the hospital simply because the dent in their car is going to be expensive to repair.
A good example: The patients on board Maryland State Police Trooper 2 were both not critically injured and had been up walking around on scene talking on their cell phones prior to EMS arriving. One is now dead and the other is permanently handicapped.
....and just in case you think that relying upon the local university HEMS operator means that it's not driven solely by profit:
Rosenberg BL et al: Aeromedical service- how does it actually contribute to the mission? J Trauma 2003; 54: 681-688
-University of Michigan Survival Flight
-Roughly $6,000,000 in operating costs
-Brought in roughly $62,000,000 and was the arrival route for patients accounting for 28% of ICU days
Those arriving by helicopter were twice as likely to have private health coverage as the patients not coming in by HEMS.
“HAIL TO THE CONQUERING HEROES!”
JUST IN CASE YOU HADN'T HEARD: THERE IS NO EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE “GOLDEN HOUR”. It was literally named the "golden hour" because that was what the happy hour at the bar Dr. Cowley and his colleagues were hanging out at when the idea was originally suggested (as a way of encouraging funeral home ambulance services to expedite transport). Legend has it that the tenents of the "golden hour" were laid out on a cocktail napkin.
There is some evidence that prehospital interval is a poor predictor of mortality (Lerner EB et al, 2003)
Last edited by a moderator: