You all know I think there should be no volunteers, but if you are going to ask people to do it for free do something for them. Why the heck are you demanding more time and money than they are already giving you? Why not video the meetings and allow them to watch at their convenience? Your wanting me to give you my time you take what I can give you, how dare you tell me how many hours/shifts I have to give you. If I have 12 hours available that I decide means nothing to me I will give it. If you tell me its not enough I will tell you how ungrateful you are and if you want more to start paying, if not take what you get and quit griping.
Basically other than requiring that a person be able to do patient care properly you have no right if you are not paying to demand anything.
Medic417,
You talk about competency, but then say that someone who can only volunteer for a few hours should be welcomed with open arms.
I run with a BUSY combination agency, and the staff that seem to have the most problems providing care are the volunteers that run one shift a week, and usually those that run less than that.
-They don't know where things are on ALL the apparatus
-They are usually our "clipboard EMT's" who don't seem to know how to treat a patient unless they have the coaching of a clipboard in their hands. This also means they don't actually touch the patient until AFTER they've asked all their demographic questions, as well as PMH and Meds.
Those of us that either run multiple shifts a week, and/or run with other agencies don't usually have these problems.
My question in my combination agency is why should we have volunteers on the truck that are not competent practitioners at one time of day, and then have a higher expectation for our career staff during the day? I think we should be staffing the aparatus with competent folks 24x7, and I think that requiring a minimum amount of hours is a way to go about that.
We currently DO NOT have a minimum standard, and it causes some resentment between those of us that run lots of shifts to those that run few.
We have a gym, as well as computer and laundry facilities that some "members" use regularly, even though they haven't set foot on an ambulance in over two months. Why should they be allowed to reap the benifits of membership without actually volunteering?
We also have a group of members that have been members for several years, and although they aren't really active, they work full-time in EMS or Critical Care settings, and still come around now and then when they can, because they got their start with us. They still have lots of patient contact, just not with our service. I've got no problem with these folks helping out when they can.
Anyway - in short, I think there should be a minimum requirement, with the goal being to ensure competent EMS providers... I feel this should be flexible for those people that are involved with other EMS agencies.