Vasopressin/Epi question in arrest

R

Rialaigh

Forum Asst. Chief
Messages
592
Reaction score
16
Points
18
Having trouble finding some concrete answer to this (probably just looking in the wrong places).


Lets say you have a 55 year old male witnessed arrest. You get on scene 15 minutes later, CPR is being done by first responders prior to your arrival. Cause may be cardiac, does not appear to be respiratory or anything else easily reversible in the field. patient in asystole IO placed, 1mg of epi given, 40 of vasopressin given 3 minutes later, ROSC achieved sinus rhythm of 80. load and start moving towards the hospital, patient codes about 8-10 minutes after you gave him the vasopressin....asystole

Do you give another 1mg of epi in addition to other intervention (CPR)

Lets say you do give the epi and get ROSC and then the patient codes again 8 minutes after that ROSC, do you give another epi?


Basically if you give vasopressin can you then not give an epi period at all no matter what? Or at what point can you start giving epi's again ? 10 minutes? 20 minutes? Re arrest like described as it is a "new" arrest" ?


Can't find anything concrete in protocols or state or AHA
 
vaso replaced the 1st or 2nd Epi. Once you use the vaso, it's a one shot deal. For a patient that arrests again, it's all Epi, every 3 to 5 minutes.
 
DEmedic said:
vaso replaced the 1st or 2nd Epi. Once you use the vaso, it's a one shot deal. For a patient that arrests again, it's all Epi, every 3 to 5 minutes.
Click to expand...



I have read different things. In a patient that arrests and you give vaso I have read that you replace the 1st or 2nd dose of epi, BUT you can continue to give epi every 3-5 after the vaso is given. Then I have read not to do that but its okay if you achieve ROSC and then the patient re arrest.


Point is you have a patient arrest, you give epi, you give vasopressin, they get ROSC 1 minute after vaso and re arrest 5 minutes after you gave the vaso

Do you immediately slam an epi then? or do you wait another 5-15 minutes till the vaso wears off a bit?
 
DEmedic said:
You go right back to the Epi.
Click to expand...

Okay, I got into a discussion today with a medic who said that once you give the vasopressin (lets say as your 2nd dose) that it allows you a bit more time because you then don't need to, and shouldn't give another epi for 15-20 minutes until they vasopressin wears off. Basically said to just do CPR and don't administer the epi
 
Well, if he was in an ACLS class or worked for my system, he'd be wrong. (If the PT rearrested, it's fair to say that the Vaso has worn off...)

Did you ask your medical director?

I didn't realize that Vasopressin was still a common code drug. (We don't use it in DE, and it was being downplayed at my services in WA)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
DEmedic said:
Well, if he was in an ACLS class or worked for my system, he'd be wrong. Ask your medical director.

I didn't realize that Vasopressin was still a common code drug. (We don't use it in DE, and it was being downplayed at my services in WA)
Click to expand...

It's making a comeback down south, more services are actually thinking of introducing it. It doesn't improve survival to discharge rates as far as the research I have come across but it sure skyrocketed our field ROSC rates here...not saying that's a good thing, just what they are pushing...

I couldn't find anywhere online (from a reputable source) where it stated that you should continue to give epi every 3-5 immediately after the administration of vasopressin. Just trying to find some clarification from some sources
 
Rialaigh said:
Okay, I got into a discussion today with a medic who said that once you give the vasopressin (lets say as your 2nd dose) that it allows you a bit more time because you then don't need to, and shouldn't give another epi for 15-20 minutes until they vasopressin wears off. Basically said to just do CPR and don't administer the epi
Click to expand...

Remediate!

Damn, can't even remember ACLS as a medic. Shoot!
 
SandpitMedic said:
Remediate!

Damn, can't even remember ACLS as a medic. Shoot!
Click to expand...

ACLS is not very clear on whether to continue giving Epi's after Vaso or not to...seems to be a personal preference kind of thing in my area
 
Rialaigh said:
ACLS is not very clear on whether to continue giving Epi's after Vaso or not to...seems to be a personal preference kind of thing in my area
Click to expand...

And I'm pretty sure neither epi or vaso have ever been shown to improve outcomes, so I really doubt any of it matters. Any protocols are suggestions are pretty much just conjecture (err..."expert consensus").

For the past couple years I've been pretty busy with school so I haven't kept up on the research (airway and some anesthesia-related research is all that I try to stay on top of right now), so there might be some other stuff out there now but last I knew, really none of ACLS had been proven to help at all. Good CPR and early defib are the only things that really matter.

But I understand you wanting to know. It's a good question, as far as the guidelines go.

P.S. 40 units of vaso is massive. Several mg's of IV epi is nothing to sneeze at, either. I don't know if there is a conversion but it's gotta be roughly equivalent to a handful of mg's of epi. These are toxic doses of drugs that ACLS is calling for. For whatever that's worth.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Rialaigh said:
Having trouble finding some concrete answer to this (probably just looking in the wrong places).


Lets say you have a 55 year old male witnessed arrest. You get on scene 15 minutes later, CPR is being done by first responders prior to your arrival. Cause may be cardiac, does not appear to be respiratory or anything else easily reversible in the field. patient in asystole IO placed, 1mg of epi given, 40 of vasopressin given 3 minutes later, ROSC achieved sinus rhythm of 80. load and start moving towards the hospital, patient codes about 8-10 minutes after you gave him the vasopressin....asystole

Do you give another 1mg of epi in addition to other intervention (CPR)

Lets say you do give the epi and get ROSC and then the patient codes again 8 minutes after that ROSC, do you give another epi?


Basically if you give vasopressin can you then not give an epi period at all no matter what? Or at what point can you start giving epi's again ? 10 minutes? 20 minutes? Re arrest like described as it is a "new" arrest" ?


Can't find anything concrete in protocols or state or AHA
Click to expand...

If your patient rearrests then your patient's status has changed. Therefore you rewtart the epi all the while try figure out what's causing the arrests to reoccur in the first place and see if you can stop it. Remember true ACLS is not working a code. It's code prevention.
 
Rialaigh said:
ACLS is not very clear on whether to continue giving Epi's after Vaso or not to...seems to be a personal preference kind of thing in my area
Click to expand...

It is very clear.

Vaso 40 units(if carried) can substitute either only the first or only the second round of 1mg 1:10,000 Epi. After that, you give Epi after 3-5 minutes, and continue to give Epi every 3-5 minutes until ROSC, rhythm change, or pronoucing death.

Very clear.

To the point of whether it works or not is not an issue during time of resuscitation. If you are not a conglomerate involved in a medical science study or prototype testing something with you medical directors approval OR acting under on line medical control- you have a duty to act according to the best medical practice you have been taught/certified. That includes ACLS or whatever your locality uses(although, ACLS is the nationally accepted standard.)

I say this so that your post, Halothane, does not confuse the young guys out there who may just get all top-doc out there and not do what is expected of them because someone said it doesn't work or is "toxic." Not to be disrespectful, but rather to clarify that ACLS is very clear- crystal clear, and not abiding by the current standards could be considered negligence or even gross negligence.

Until the medical community or accrediting bodies officially change the standards - which I agree needs to be done - we have to be providers of what we subscribe to.
 
DEmedic said:
Well, if he was in an ACLS class or worked for my system, he'd be wrong. (If the PT rearrested, it's fair to say that the Vaso has worn off...)

Did you ask your medical director?

I didn't realize that Vasopressin was still a common code drug. (We don't use it in DE, and it was being downplayed at my services in WA)
Click to expand...

Same here we don't carry Vasopressin, I don't know of any services that carry it.

Rialaigh said:
ACLS is not very clear on whether to continue giving Epi's after Vaso or not to...seems to be a personal preference kind of thing in my area
Click to expand...

Incorrect.

ACLS states that you are allowed to substitute the 1st or 2nd round of Epi with 40 International Units of Vasopressin. But its a one time use.

Here is the ACLS algorithm for Adult Cardiac arrest,
http://www.emed.ie/Cardiovascular/Life_Sup/ALS_BLS.php

Here is some research on the Epi vs vasopressin debate. Clearly shows an increase in positive outcomes. but only in small groups basically they are saying they need a much larger randomized study to prove their theory.

http://www.bestbets.org/bets/bet.php?id=00407
 
DEmedic said:
vaso replaced the 1st or 2nd Epi. Once you use the vaso, it's a one shot deal. For a patient that arrests again, it's all Epi, every 3 to 5 minutes.
Click to expand...

This. We just went over this in my ACLS class today.
 
Yeah I don't know... I just feel like this topic is a little rediculous. This is basic ALS provider stuff. In some places this is ILS stuff.

I don't get the confusion. The confusion is confusing me. If that makes sense. It's not a grey area, it's cut-and-dry.
 
SandpitMedic said:
Yeah I don't know... I just feel like this topic is a little rediculous. This is basic ALS provider stuff. In some places this is ILS stuff.

I don't get the confusion. The confusion is confusing me. If that makes sense. It's not a grey area, it's cut-and-dry.
Click to expand...


I guess it was just a misunderstanding on my part. I couldn't find anywhere in the ACLS protocols or other recommendations explicitly stating to continue giving Epi after Vasopressin administration.



I understand the use of Vaso, I understand that is a substitute for the first or second round of Epi, and it was my understanding that you continue to give epi every 3-5 afterwards based on what I was taught. I am trying to find something that specifically states the continued use of Epi after vasopressin IS the guideline.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Rialaigh said:
I guess it was just a misunderstanding on my part. I couldn't find anywhere in the ACLS protocols or other recommendations explicitly stating to continue giving Epi after Vasopressin administration.



I understand the use of Vaso, I understand that is a substitute for the first or second round of Epi, and it was my understanding that you continue to give epi every 3-5 afterwards based on what I was taught. I am trying to find something that specifically states the continued use of Epi after vasopressin IS the guideline.
Click to expand...

Well, we're all telling you. It is the guideline. And it is in print right in the ACLS book under cardiac arrest. Look in the book and you should see it.

I believe you're reading too much into it. Seeking "unicorns" where there are not any. You should keep in mind that what is being taught to you in your ACLS class is what you need to do on scene. It is not as organized everytime like those scenario videos, but the steps are the same.
 
Images removed- old algorithms.

For your viewing pleasure. Straight from the text. The bold part in box 10 is, dare I say, explicit.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I used to be a stickler on ACLS guidelines, unfortunately looking over the past 45 + years there has not been any remarkable changes on outcome.

A physician friend of mine that sits on the ACLS Emergency Cardiac Care Committee (ECCC) informed me truthfully we have yet found anything that really makes the difference except good old quality CPR and early defibrillation. If we were really considering outcome percentages alone and solely based upon the pharmaceuticals administered; how many of the medications would still be allowed? As he described, " the reason most (medications) are kept in the protocols are kept is because there is nothing else really to administer (to do) and they do not reduce outcome values either"

It goes back to outcomes in cardiac arrest is dismissal. Over the past few decades we have increased it a few points. With this we still need to study and try to increase but also our emphasis should also be in prevention as well. This where EMS has been instrumental in.

R/r 911
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top