- 4,520
- 3,243
- 113
Yeah I don't know... I just feel like this topic is a little rediculous. This is basic ALS provider stuff. In some places this is ILS stuff.
I don't get the confusion. The confusion is confusing me. If that makes sense. It's not a grey area, it's cut-and-dry.
Well, we're all telling you. It is the guideline. And it is in print right in the ACLS book under cardiac arrest. Look in the book and you should see it.
I believe you're reading too much into it. Seeking "unicorns" where there are not any. You should keep in mind that what is being taught to you in your ACLS class is what you need to do on scene. It is not as organized everytime like those scenario videos, but the steps are the same.
Keep in mind ACLS is a set of guidelines, not a religion.
When I was a new paramedic, I knew ACLS cold. I had every line of the protocols memorized perfectly. I could draw the algorithms in my sleep. I felt like it was important to know them that well if I wanted to be a good paramedic.
Fast forward a bunch of years, and it's been quite a while since I worried so much about ACLS. The truth is, outside of EMS, codes are rarely run perfectly according to ACLS. I doubt any of the intensivists or anesthesiologist that I work with know ACLS nearly as well as most paramedics. The in-house clinicians generally adhere to the basic principles (do good CPR, shock VF/VT as soon as possible, give pressors, look for reversible causes), but are not sticklers for the protocols because, frankly, everyone knows that aside from the aforementioned basics, they are BS.
The point is, the ACLS guidelines are simply meant to provide a framework. And while we are responsible for following our protocols, maybe we shouldn't take them so seriously that we get all riled up when someone doesn't have every_single_word of the algorithms memorized perfectly.