To Vent or Not To Vent

18G

18G

Paramedic
Messages
1,368
Reaction score
12
Points
38
Quick question: Regarding ventilatory management in an IFT environment where transports range from 45 - >2hrs, do you feel it is vital to have your patient on a ventilator or feel it is sufficient to bag them?

What detriments do you see with bagging a critical patient for this long after they have been stabilized in the ED? I see quite a few but am interested in seeing what everyone else thinks.
 
What detriments?? If they require bagging chances are there's something pretty serious going on with them, if you're going 45 minutes to two hours you're basically committing yourself to only bagging for that amount of time leaving you kind of useless if something else happens.

Plus I don't like bagging for more than a few minutes... Definitely not going to do it longer than I have too.
 
Sasha said:
What detriments?? If they require bagging chances are there's something pretty serious going on with them, if you're going 45 minutes to two hours you're basically committing yourself to only bagging for that amount of time leaving you kind of useless if something else happens.

Plus I don't like bagging for more than a few minutes... Definitely not going to do it longer than I have too.
Click to expand...

What I mean by detriments are things that can't be provided (or provided optimally) with just a BVM.

For one example, patients that are suffering from say massive aspiration, pulmonary edema, near drowning, ARDS, etc, and the associated lung changes like surfactant washout, atelectasis, and increased diffusion distance, are gonna need PEEP without a doubt. In these instances without PEEP, increased ventilatory pressures are going to be needed and gas exchange won't be maximized due to airway collapse and increased pressure required to reexpand the airways. So a BVM is not ideal especially when a PEEP valve isn't even available.

Also, with bagging you run the risk of a provider not concentrating on rate and volume delivered and exposing the patient to episodes of hypercapnia and hypoxia which for a head injury or head bleed can be lethal.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If you can vent them and have a competent provider to run said ventilator and deal with the complications inherent with it, they should be vented simply because it is less likely to produce complications (such as baro- or volutrauma to name the two big ones) than bagging with no practicable feedback in terms of ventilatory rate, tidal volume, airway pressures, PEEP, etc.

not concentrating on rate and volume delivered and exposing the patient to episodes of hypercapnia and hypoxia which for a head injury or head bleed can be lethal.
Click to expand...

...or hypocapnia and hyperoxia which can be just as dangerous. The problem with excessive ventilation in head trauma is much more common than hypoventilation. I can't recall the last time I've seen a tubed head trauma patient come in hypercapnic but I've seen more than my fair share of hypocapnic ones because of overzealous EMS providers.
 
Vent is the way to go. If ventmedic was here she could explain more fully the benefits and the risks. Now when I say vent I mean a real vent not just a lung popper like autovent or similar that try and package all patients into just a couple of settings.
 
You can kill a pt by overbagging them. Just off the top of my head, if you have a pt in a low flow state such as hypovolemia or septic shock, the venuous return may be as low as 4-6 mmHg. PPV can be as much as 15 mmHg. It is different than when pts inspire, or even hyperventilate, since they create neg. pressure, which aids venuous return and coronary circulation. It is much better to have the pt vented, and have the vent settings/PEEP determined for you beforehand.
 
medic417 said:
Vent is the way to go. If ventmedic was here she could explain more fully the benefits and the risks. Now when I say vent I mean a real vent not just a lung popper like autovent or similar that try and package all patients into just a couple of settings.
Click to expand...

The autovent is barbaric.
 
46Young said:
It is much better to have the pt vented, and have the vent settings/PEEP determined for you beforehand.
Click to expand...

Negative ghost riders that is a recipe for disaster. Do your own calculations. If you can not you should not be in charge of a vent patient.
 
It's very, very difficult to provide consistent ventilations over the length of transport, both in volume, rate and pressure. Too great a variation in any one of these categories may not only cause acid-base disturbance, it may cause mechanical damage to the lung as well.

Most CCT protocols I'm familiar with call for a ventilator to be used for any transport >10min. That said, the do occasionally fail, meaning it's important your able to provide good ventilations over a period of time.
 
medic417 said:
Negative ghost riders that is a recipe for disaster. Do your own calculations. If you can not you should not be in charge of a vent patient.
Click to expand...

Agreed. Matching settings without the ability to troubleshoot (not to mention most transport vents can't deliver the same level of ventilation as an ICU vent, do tweaking may be needed) is bad juju.
 
medic417 said:
Negative ghost riders that is a recipe for disaster. Do your own calculations. If you can not you should not be in charge of a vent patient.
Click to expand...

How many months of education do RT's have that enable them to prescribe vent settings? Most paramedic programs hardly even address vents. Most employers that run vents may give an hour or two inservice on their vent, and that's about it. This is standard for our field.
 
46Young said:
How many months of education do RT's have that enable them to prescribe vent settings? Most paramedic programs hardly even address vents. Most employers that run vents may give an hour or two inservice on their vent, and that's about it. This is standard for our field.
Click to expand...

If you are not willing to become educated then sadly you should stay with those barbaric lung poppers. A real vent is a wonderful tool when used properly but can quickly become deadly when handled incorrectly.
 
Definitely a vent. In my opinion a vent should be mandatory for all patients, IFT or 911. Fair enough using a bag mask when the tube first goes down but it should be a temporary measure used briefly until the vent is set up.
 
re

Vents are definately the way to go. Amazing what can be done with them once you learn the various strategies and have working knowledge of the vent you use
 
Definitely vent them, on proper vent settings for temp corrected ABG's. Not just for accurate manipulation of PaO2 and PaCO2, but also proper management of intrapulmonary pressures. Not to mentioned the obvious fact that if your pt needs ventilation odds are they're Going to need hands free for proper critical care throughout the trip.

What if your pt needs an accurate BP? Which is at least every 5 min. What are you going to do?
 
Many hospitals I speak with have been writing policies stating that vent should be used on all transports, regardless of time or distance. The evidence is very clear that seasoned anaesthetists can't bag with the consistency required. Yes, people still do despite the studies, but that's just 'cause they are ignoring the data or are lazy. The main reason many DON'T is lack of equipment, cost and other issues not related to actual patient care. If you have it handy and management OK's the associated costs, use it.
 
If ventmedic was here she could explain more fully the benefits and the risks.
Click to expand...

....and what exactly do we need her for? She'd simply argue that only an RT would fully understand and could handle it, blah, blah, blah. Let's not give her any provocation to come back under a new alias.

If you have any specific question MSDeltaFlt and myself are both RTs so no need for the grandiose views of the career field courtesy of everyone's favorite respiratory terrorist.

How many months of education do RT's have that enable them to prescribe vent settings?
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

Basically a full year of clinical experience before they are turned loose.

2.5 paramedic program equivalents.
Click to expand...

Nah, remember a third to half of the program is general education and even then a lot of the non-clinical rotation coursework RTs go through is not specific to ventilator management.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
usafmedic45 said:
....and what exactly do we need her for? She'd simply argue that only an RT would fully understand and could handle it, blah, blah, blah. Let's not give her any provocation to come back under a new alias.

.
Click to expand...

Actually she provided many good references and even broke them down to easy to understand points, so easy even a medic mill Paramedic could grasp the points. After many here were rude she did seem to snap and stop providing the quality material. If you do not recall those facts well maybe you were one of those threatened by her. I do wish she would return as her old self, the quality ventmedic.
 
medic417 said:
Actually she provided many good references and even broke them down to easy to understand points, so easy even a medic mill Paramedic could grasp the points. After many here were rude she did seem to snap and stop providing the quality material. If you do not recall those facts well maybe you were one of those threatened by her. I do wish she would return as her old self, the quality ventmedic.
Click to expand...

She knew her stuff but a lot of the "being rude" was simply those of us who saw that while she was a damn good therapist (and I will defend that aspect of her to my last breath), she suffered from the major problem in respiratory therapy: The belief that we are somehow better than EMS providers, nurses, docs, etc simply because we have a specialist skill.

I learned a lot from her and if she could keep the "politics" of the RT profession off this forum and to herself when it's apparent that the few other RTs on the forum didn't want to discuss it, I'd be the first one to welcome her back here. Despite the attitude, she was the person I went to if I hit the limits of my own knowledge because she has a lot more experience than I do.

After many here were rude she did seem to snap and stop providing the quality material.
Click to expand...

I'll send you a PM about this. I'm pretty sure it's a TOS violation to discuss what actually happened in public.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top