MedicPrincess
Forum Deputy Chief
- 2,021
- 3
- 0
We were having a discussion with our Shift Commander a couple shift back about giving pain meds to an ankle fx. The patient stated he didn't want any, so the medic on that truck BLS'd the call. Basically, if the patient would have wanted the Morphine, the call would have been ALS, complete with IV, Monitor, and O2. Patient said no, so it was BLS. Patient got a pillow splint and O2. Essentially the EMT on that truck had come to my partner to complain about her Medic making that BLS. My partner agreed. No pain meds, and a non-complicated fx is BLS. She puts me with them all the time.
Now we were talking to our Shift Commander about it. He made the statment to the effect of "If it is possible that we can do more for our patients, then the person who is capable of providing that level of care should be attending to the patient, so that more can be given." He says there are no could go either way patients.....cut and dry...BLS or ALS.
That being said, in my opinion, all patients who have called 711 are technically ALS patients then. Even the guy we pick up at the bus stop who wants to go to the ER for eval of that mosquito bite. I have been thinking about that. On your "BLS" 911 calls, could you possibly do more for that patient? They called for an ambulance, why shouldn't they get the highest level of care available on that truck? And doesn't that relagate the EMT back to "Ambulance Driver" status?
I disagree with the cut and dry theory. If a patient has refused pain meds, I am perfectly capable of sitting in the back and riding in with the patient. I can monitor vitals. I can assess and reassess. And if the patient decides he just can't take the pain of my partner driving (heck, I have asked for Morphine after one of her finest drives), I am capable of sticking my head up front and telling her to pull over, he needs pain relief.
What do you think, are all or should all 911 patients receive ALS care all the way to the hospital? All of ours get an assessment by the ALS person on scene, but IMO not everyone needs ALS level of care, even if we can technically "do more."
Now we were talking to our Shift Commander about it. He made the statment to the effect of "If it is possible that we can do more for our patients, then the person who is capable of providing that level of care should be attending to the patient, so that more can be given." He says there are no could go either way patients.....cut and dry...BLS or ALS.
That being said, in my opinion, all patients who have called 711 are technically ALS patients then. Even the guy we pick up at the bus stop who wants to go to the ER for eval of that mosquito bite. I have been thinking about that. On your "BLS" 911 calls, could you possibly do more for that patient? They called for an ambulance, why shouldn't they get the highest level of care available on that truck? And doesn't that relagate the EMT back to "Ambulance Driver" status?
I disagree with the cut and dry theory. If a patient has refused pain meds, I am perfectly capable of sitting in the back and riding in with the patient. I can monitor vitals. I can assess and reassess. And if the patient decides he just can't take the pain of my partner driving (heck, I have asked for Morphine after one of her finest drives), I am capable of sticking my head up front and telling her to pull over, he needs pain relief.
What do you think, are all or should all 911 patients receive ALS care all the way to the hospital? All of ours get an assessment by the ALS person on scene, but IMO not everyone needs ALS level of care, even if we can technically "do more."