- 7,848
- 2,801
- 113
I am not ok with violence and I don't advocate for it.Was worse here. DC was DC police+ nat'l guard + secret service police, 50+ injuries to the collective group of responders. The worst part was the revolutionary war style tactic, of gather folks in a church and then burn it. Other history fact is it was the church of the presidents (every president since James Madison in 1816 attended there once).
At least 50 Secret Service agents injured by rioters
Rioters threw Molotov cocktails and bottles at agents and set buildings on firewww.policeone.com
Do the police really think there won't be a confrontation when they move on peaceful demonstrators with rubber bullets and tear gas before a curfew starts? https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/...cal-of-president-trumps-church-visit/2319756/
Get it together. You know what the police did when the crowds in Denver didn't disband a full two hours after the curfew started last night? Nothing. Because nothing needing police was happening. There was no violence, no setting fires, no destruction of property. People were expressing emotion in a non-destrutive way. Let it be. Maybe if law enforcement stopped confronting disobodience as if it always always always leads to rioting there wouldn't be so much rioting?
The public safety community has struggled for years with optics, and it continues to.