Supreme Court Rules Woman Who Saved Friend Is Liable

While Good Sam (now) covers "Medical Care" and not RESCUE... someone who stops to render aid to someone who is injured and needs to remove the injured person from a vehicle to address severe bleeding/injury would not (and could not) be held liable for the medical care... but could completely liable for secondary injury caused/aggravated by the "rescue" that was necessary to be able to address the severe injury/bleeding that would have been untreatable before... Why? Rescue isn't considered "medical care."

In any event, unless absolutely necessary, I'm not going to want to attempt a rapid extrication from a vehicle by myself...
 
I don't like to curse, but YOU GOTTA BE F-IN KIDDING ME RIGHT!!! What kinda of horse bologna is this!!! You do the right thing, and this...I guess its true, no good deed goes unpunished.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top