medicaltransient
Forum Lieutenant
- 162
- 32
- 28
That sounds like an administrative problem if it's 911 abuse. As long as they are aware continue to practice your assessment and exam.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes. We at AMR in the springs have them too, but now they are only so we don't have to give firefighters a lift back to their stations. It's a near-fireable offense to give them to "non-emergency" patients now, sadly.Wasn't Denver health giving out taxi vouchers at one point for calls like that?
That's probably one of the dumbest things I have heard. The apparatus that the hosemonkeys got to scene on don't follow you to the hospital? Every place I've worked that let us take fire riders (except for one) had the apparatus follow 55 to the hospital to get their FFYes. We at AMR in the springs have them too, but now they are only so we don't have to give firefighters a lift back to their stations. It's a near-fireable offense to give them to "non-emergency" patients now, sadly.
...CSFD is now riding taxis back to their stations if they transport a call with AMR? Oh boy.Yes. We at AMR in the springs have them too, but now they are only so we don't have to give firefighters a lift back to their stations. It's a near-fireable offense to give them to "non-emergency" patients now, sadly.
The on duty medical division lieutenant is supposed to take them back (they are on 24/7 as "EMS supervisors" [lulz]) if they are available. But sometimes that doesn't happen and AMR has to pay for them to go back. Because they provided so much help that they need more than 1.3 million AMR already pays the city to operate there. Oh and why don't you just take a crap ton of supplies out of my ambulance because you "can't remember what we used last call."...CSFD is now riding taxis back to their stations if they transport a call with AMR? Oh boy.
The companies that are relatively close to the hospital follow, but are still in service. The outlying companies never follow, they go back in service with three.That's probably one of the dumbest things I have heard. The apparatus that the hosemonkeys got to scene on don't follow you to the hospital? Every place I've worked that let us take fire riders (except for one) had the apparatus follow 55 to the hospital to get their FF
Well I'm just part time so it's a little easier.Jeebus...I've heard a lot of things about Colorado Springs over the years and they're all in the same vein. How does the AMR shop keep people working for more than 2 months? Or all jobs in Colorado that hard to come by that you guys will accept being treated like the *****es of the city?
This sounds like a psychosocial issue rather than one of direct medical pathology.
Yes, we have a number of pt here who call because of things other than medical.
If it is an obviously non-medical event Control will decline attendance explaining ambulances are for medical emergencies.
If the patient is obviously using the system inappropriately then a patient management plan is developed.
Here is the text of a brief regarding one such patient
In the period from 1 February to 31 May 2014, a patient with a history of chronic pain syndrome made 21 ambulance calls; 19 (90%) of which required an ambulance response, resulting in 7 transports to the emergency department (33% of calls).
After identifying this patient as a frequent caller, local Operations management in conjunction with Clinical Development and the patient’s GP, implemented a Patient Care and Response Plan. Following implementation of the plan, from 1 July to 31 October the patient made 59 ambulance calls, 47 (80%) of which were managed over the phone by a Clinical Support Officer (CSO) on the Clinical Desk without an ambulance being dispatched. Phone advice given by the CSO included guidance on medication administration and advising the patient to follow up with her GP.
On 12 occasions (20%), an ambulance was dispatched as the patient was unable to be contacted by the CSO on call back, or the patient hung up during phone triage meaning the plan could not be followed. These calls were allocated a GREEN response. Of those 12 ambulance responses, the patient was transported to the emergency department only once (2% of calls), for a condition that was not covered by the plan. Clinical advice for ambulance crews contained within the patient’s plan has supported crews in making robust, informed decisions regarding transport and reduced transports to ED by 85%. As a result of this plan, the patient is now receiving a consistent standard of care in her community.
By keeping the patient in her home where appropriate, she does not encounter the inconvenience of having to find transport for the 40 minute drive home from the emergency department which is particularly problematic for her. The patient is also being treated by community health professionals (GP, nurses and pharmacist) that are familiar with her condition.
By minimising ambulance responses to chronic conditions, the availability of ambulance resources is maintained for emergency calls, reducing response times and improving outcomes for time-critical patients. Reducing repeat ED presentations for the same condition enables hospital staff to focus their care towards seriously unwell patients, helps maintain bed capacity and improves acute patient flow, shortening emergency department stays - a key goal of the Ministry of Health.
Local management teams and Clinical Development will continue to identify frequent callers and work with the patient’s GP and other health professionals to implement appropriate Patient Care and Response Plans to improve patient outcomes.
There is going to come a time that you are running a call on this "patient", when a critical call comes in. You could have been 2-5 minutes away, but since you are running on the person who you just did two hours ago, the next available unit is 10-15 minutes away. Big difference in EMS? Not usually, but big difference to the family of that patient, who needs you there and pay to have you there as quickly as possible
Mental health is obviously a factor here. Whether it's just loneliness/depression or an inability to understand and cope with life (TBI, low IQ etc.) try to remain compassionate for that reason.
That being said, our last issue was dealt with through the ED and his parents were contacted to discuss the issue (he was an adult). Every time he called 911 ems arrived and he would have to call his mom prior to transport. At first he quit calling, but then it picked up again (daily) and his family decided to take responsibility and moved him home.
Another one we had quit calling once homecare was set up to come by twice a day (mostly just to chat). That is still cheaper than an ambulance and ER stay.
We have some others that poloce are actively trying to deal with but no luck. All I can say is don't be the hero and try to end their habit, it's not worth your job.
Treat it like a training exercise. Like a nr medical or trauma assessment.
I'm assuming the frequent callers have government assisted healthcare where they pay nothing out of pocket.
What kind of burden would it have on the taxpayers for someone who takes 500+ trips?