@iExposeDeformities so a few things. Again, this thread is mega old so we’re not getting anything else but our own spin and speculations at this point.
If that’s what you’re asking, EMS is not for diagnosing patients.
This line of thought is outdated at best. At worst, it limits the field provider to a small box within their critical thinking abilities to rule in, or out (yes, limited diagnosing) a handful of therapies that may need to be provided from basic to advanced life support measures within their respective scopes.
In essence your train of thought unfortunately defines the classic “cookie-cutter” mentality. Try broadening your horizons
.
30 resps is on the high side which will most likely produce shallow respiration’s but not all the time and combine that with unconsciousness? You bet I’m OPA and bag. But like you said, if they’re satting >95 on O2 then that’s that
Lastly, and to further illustrate both your point, and mine—what if by assisting their ventilations you’re doing more harm than good?
Compensatory means just that: they’re compensating (if in fact they are here) for something, e.g., ASA OD or DKA/ HHNK. It’s also why a broad brush to paint with is better than a narrow one to most clinicians. These subgroups you may actually not want to assist.
Hopefully this makes more sense, and you can begin to see why field diagnosis—whether we call it that yet, or not
—plays an important role in prehospital medicine.
Afterall, being a part of medicine means endless evolutionary changes. Some are good, some are bad, and some bring us right back to where we started
.