Blah, just had this "debate" at work. Makes me frustrated sometimes. They told me that it is not allowed, so I told them that in our protocols for Santa Clara County, under routine medical care - adult (S04), it defines "Baseline vital signs: pulse rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, pulse oximetry", and then under BLS care, it uses the term "baseline vital signs". It does not exclude it from our Pulse Oximetry protocol (M04), but it does put emphasis that certain patients require "high flow" oxygen, and it also says this under each BLS protocols whether a patient should be administered oxygen or not meaning that pulse oximetry cannot be used to determine how much oxygen to adminsiter, but rather just a number we can document and report - if the protocols were followed word for word verbatim. I then also pointed out that under title 22 division 9 article 1 chapter 2 section 100063, it doesn't exclude pulse oximetry as a diagnostic sign that we could record. The class laughed at me "he said the section number, it must be true" (or something like that), and then I was told that "it is NOT in your scope of practice". The debate continued "we do it, it happens, but do not record that you did it, write down per RN".
I hate it that people tell you to learn your protocols and policies, yet whatever they say triumphs what it truly says, and even though they tell you to not put down inaccurate information or act outside of your scope of practice, it's okay with pulse oximetry to break the rules a little bit and then lie about it. They tell you MECHANISMS, MECHANISMS, MECHANISMS, understand physiology, yet they ignore it "that's not how it works in real life", and don't know or misunderstand the mechanism or physiology.
At this point with pulse oximetry, I've decided that I will refuse to do it, I will record what it is if reported to me by a nurse or if it's already hooked up to the patient making it clear that it is a number that I see, but do not understand, and I am simply recording it from observation, and if anyone ask, I will tell them that our laws, protocols, and policies do not clearly state whether it is or isn't allowed for EMTs to attach to their finger and to include it when making decisions based on sound clinical judgement.
At least on the 17th of April, I will be taking a short two hour class on Environmental Emergencies that will be taught by our county medical director. If I get the chance, I hope I can ask him about it along with some other things.
This debate made me a little mad. It reminded me at EMT school and at my previous EMT job when I'd say something, people laughed at me, didn't follow my instructions, told me I was wrong, but then tell me things like "how are you so smart?" or "you're smart." I just think "how dare you insult me by calling me smart when there are objective clues that you don't truly believe that - @#$% off". I wish I could say that to them nicely.