Well I'm going to place myself on the side of the administer o2 due to the dizziness a the pt being lethargic. 2lpm. My thinking is that even though vs looks good perfusion may be decreased. If symptoms resolved after o2 i would continue to hospital. If nothing got better i would remove. Even if i left it on the length of the transport would not cause any adverse effects and probably would not even dry out their nose. My bet is that she could live without it for duration. But if i can enter that er and state pt complaining of xyz and abc did not relieve symptoms then the nurses and dr can have a better idea what's going on.
We
Do
Not
Administer
Treatments
That
Are
Not
Warranted
Dizziness without any underlying presumed pathology affecting oxygen delivery is NOT a reason to give O2. Half the patients I pick up complain they are dizzy and 1/4 of them if even do I put on O2. Patient has no respiratory complaint, lung sounds reveal no insult to the lungs with great air flow, where is the issue with oxygen delivery?
Administering O2 for chest pain in theory, useless. Stroke? Useless. The issue is not oxygen intake of the body it is oxygen delivery which can't be fixed in an ambulance.
The three parts of oxygen delivery are vessels, Heme/RBCs, heart. If the blood/heme cannot reach the site, no amount of oxygen in the world is going to increase perfusion.
It is not a warranted treatment 9/10 when EMS providers administer it.
If a patient states they are in fact short of breath, administer o2 titrated to effect don't just slap a NRB at 15lpm on them. They may only need 2 liters. Sometimes doing nothing at all does the most good.
As I understand it, cells can be damaged by exposure to more O2 than those cells are able to use. I think the mechanism is free radicals interfering with cellular metabolism. Vene, can you confirm? New ACLS guidelines for ACS and CVA recommend supplementary O2 only when the SpO2 falls below 94%. This definitely conflicts with decades-old primary training that O2 can't hurt.
Yes. As I understand it, after talking with Vene a few times about it, the short version is the body is set up to intake 20.9% oxygen from the environment. Free radicals naturally occur as chemistry in the body utilizes oxygen and the body contains "antioxidants" to combat these free radicals that would otherwise harm tissues through the process of "oxidation." The unpaired electron of the superoxide O2- ion (free radical ion of oxygen) essentially steals an electron from what it comes in contact with, which is hopefully an antioxident such as glutathione that would prevent it from binding to tissues and interrupting important biological processes.
When we increase the FiO2 and the body has nowhere to put it, many more free radicals form than naturally would which can deplete the antioxidizing reserves of the body and actually worsen disease processes, lead to new disease or form localized scar tissue.
Oxidation: (yes I linked wikipedia)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxidation