Eh....it's actually mostly indicated, and has WAY less potential to harm than ammonia. I've used them extensively as a way to check responsiveness.That's punitive medicine and absolutely inappropriate.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Eh....it's actually mostly indicated, and has WAY less potential to harm than ammonia. I've used them extensively as a way to check responsiveness.That's punitive medicine and absolutely inappropriate.
It's not the one's who respond to a trap squeeze or that obviously want to be "unconsciois" I use it on. It's those boderline, possibly legit medical issue patients that MAYBE narcotized ect that I'll pull the trigger on an NPA for.People still have ammonia around?
And a trap squeeze is easier than an NPA. If they want to be "unresponsive" but they're ventilating without issue, I just leave them alone. I've got no reason to cram a 34fr hose up someone's snout. In my book, that's punitive and inappropriate.
It's not the one's who respond to a trap squeeze or that obviously want to be "unconsciois" I use it on. It's those boderline, possibly legit medical issue patients that MAYBE narcotized ect that I'll pull the trigger on an NPA for.
I've used them extensively as a way to check responsiveness.
An NPA isn't a tool to check for responsiveness. It's an airway adjunct. If they need assistance with ventilation it you want to assure an airway while you wait for the Narcan to kick in... Sure. But as a assessment tool? That's pretty sketchy.
Where I was doing ride a longs, we have a lot of drunks that "pass out*" and snore so we are required to attempt an opa.NPA to check for responsiveness on a possible drunk case to see if they are faking or if you do not stay awake on me.
If you think an NPA is a reasonable assessment tool, you need to work on your assessment skills. Sorry. The truth hurts.Not as an assessment maneuver per se, but I think its perfectly legit for those "I think this dude might be faking but I'm not sure.....if he really is out of it I want an NPA, and if he's really not out of it, I'll know as soon as I try to place it" situations.
If you think an NPA is a reasonable assessment tool, you need to work on your assessment skills. Sorry. The truth hurts.
This. Every now and then we will get patients who we think are acting however they are doing such a good job that we aren't 100% sure they are faking. Mix that in with snoring respirations and they bought themselves an NPA (after I warn them if they don't wake up a tube is going down their nose).If you think no one in the field will ever successfully fool you feigning unresponsiveness, then you need to spend some more time in the field. As you gain experience you'll also gain humility.
Who ever said anything about it being a "reasonable assessment tool"?
There is a big difference between doing an intervention just to what the response is, and doing an intervention because you think it's likely indicated, though you can't be sure.
Not as an assessment maneuver per se, but I think its perfectly legit for those "I think this dude might be faking but I'm not sure.....if he really is out of it I want an NPA, and if he's really not out of it, I'll know as soon as I try to place it" situations.
Sorry - if it quacks like a duck...it's a duck, regardless of what you call it. After nearly 40 years, I know what a duck looks like. There are LOTS of ways to assess an adequate airway and the need (or not) for airway support - and ramming in an NPA because you can't tell whether they're faking it or not is a lousy assessment move.