Wes
Forum Lieutenant
- 193
- 0
- 16
While I do enjoy educating folks on medical-legal issues, I really try to stay out of these discussions for a couple of reasons.
First, laws regarding tort liability (including duty to act and negligence), Good Samaritan statutes, and regulations on EMS practice are INCREDIBLY variable from state to state. The overwhelming majority of laws relating to EMS are enacted and interpreted at the state level. As I'm a Texas attorney, any opinions that I might have, which are NOT legal advice, would be based solely on my understandings of Texas law, which probably wouldn't apply unless the case occured in Texas.
Second, each situation has a different set of facts. As the old saying goes, bad facts make for bad law. I really hesitate to get into a fact-specific situation as the specific facts of a case, even hypothetical, may lead to a legal conclusion that might not be generally applicable.
Finally, while I do enjoy the educational opportunities and the banter, I often find myself in a situation where I'm fighting a non-attorney whose arguments and understandings are based on dogma, personal biases, urban legends, war stories from their instructor, and a lack of understanding of law and legal reasoning turn the discussion into the legal equivalent of arguing with a brick wall. Such is the nature of some EMS forums online. Further, it pains me when so many people want to protect their professional bailiwicks such as EMS or nursing, yet feel perfectly comfortable giving a legal opinion.
I apologize for disappointing, Christopher, but I decline to participate in giving an opinion on the facts presented in what may or may not be a hypothetical discussion. I do appreciate the opportunity to share why I participate so rarely in EMS legal discussions online, though.
First, laws regarding tort liability (including duty to act and negligence), Good Samaritan statutes, and regulations on EMS practice are INCREDIBLY variable from state to state. The overwhelming majority of laws relating to EMS are enacted and interpreted at the state level. As I'm a Texas attorney, any opinions that I might have, which are NOT legal advice, would be based solely on my understandings of Texas law, which probably wouldn't apply unless the case occured in Texas.
Second, each situation has a different set of facts. As the old saying goes, bad facts make for bad law. I really hesitate to get into a fact-specific situation as the specific facts of a case, even hypothetical, may lead to a legal conclusion that might not be generally applicable.
Finally, while I do enjoy the educational opportunities and the banter, I often find myself in a situation where I'm fighting a non-attorney whose arguments and understandings are based on dogma, personal biases, urban legends, war stories from their instructor, and a lack of understanding of law and legal reasoning turn the discussion into the legal equivalent of arguing with a brick wall. Such is the nature of some EMS forums online. Further, it pains me when so many people want to protect their professional bailiwicks such as EMS or nursing, yet feel perfectly comfortable giving a legal opinion.
I apologize for disappointing, Christopher, but I decline to participate in giving an opinion on the facts presented in what may or may not be a hypothetical discussion. I do appreciate the opportunity to share why I participate so rarely in EMS legal discussions online, though.