So sorry bossy, but you don't get to reference someone by name with specific comments and then try and backpedal from that. You said what you said...at least stand by it.
And you are still off topic...this isn't about who uses EMT-B's, or how many, or how they are used or where, but what the pay for them should be, and specifically (though I'm flexible on this) what it should be in NYC. And, it's not that EMt-B's are useless, just that they can do very, very little for their patients.
Now, I asked some specific questions, usually the same ones, and so far the only one who has really tried to answer them is the youngest, most inexperienced person here. Would you like to give it a shot?
1. What is it that an EMT-B does MEDICALLY for their patients, (since this is the MEDICAL field) that makes it appropriate to pay them high wages?
2. What should an EMT-B be making? Really, I don't care if it's hourly, monthly, yearly, but let's see a number.
3. Why is it that lower level providers in EMS feel they are entitled to so much when they do so little for their patients?
(for the record, when I've said minimum pay or things like that, I don't mean state/federal minimum wage at all; that's completely ridiculous. I just mean a wage that is commenserate with the care given and responsibilities, which is nil in the case of an EMT-B; doesn't matter if you've been there 10 years, what are you doing for your patient? Next to nothing.)
Just because a service saves some money by hiring an EMT-B is not a reason to pay them more; if that was the case, then see my McDonald's analogy; those guys would be making the big bucks. Pay increases come from doing your job better, which in this case means providing more and better patient care. Something that is essentially impossible at the EMT-B level; there is next to nothing that you can do for a patient.
Your exposure scenario isn't applicable either...on the job injuries and exposures are covered. Doesn't matter where you are, you are covered.
And you are still off topic...this isn't about who uses EMT-B's, or how many, or how they are used or where, but what the pay for them should be, and specifically (though I'm flexible on this) what it should be in NYC. And, it's not that EMt-B's are useless, just that they can do very, very little for their patients.
Now, I asked some specific questions, usually the same ones, and so far the only one who has really tried to answer them is the youngest, most inexperienced person here. Would you like to give it a shot?
1. What is it that an EMT-B does MEDICALLY for their patients, (since this is the MEDICAL field) that makes it appropriate to pay them high wages?
2. What should an EMT-B be making? Really, I don't care if it's hourly, monthly, yearly, but let's see a number.
3. Why is it that lower level providers in EMS feel they are entitled to so much when they do so little for their patients?
(for the record, when I've said minimum pay or things like that, I don't mean state/federal minimum wage at all; that's completely ridiculous. I just mean a wage that is commenserate with the care given and responsibilities, which is nil in the case of an EMT-B; doesn't matter if you've been there 10 years, what are you doing for your patient? Next to nothing.)
Just because a service saves some money by hiring an EMT-B is not a reason to pay them more; if that was the case, then see my McDonald's analogy; those guys would be making the big bucks. Pay increases come from doing your job better, which in this case means providing more and better patient care. Something that is essentially impossible at the EMT-B level; there is next to nothing that you can do for a patient.
Your exposure scenario isn't applicable either...on the job injuries and exposures are covered. Doesn't matter where you are, you are covered.