Sasha
Forum Chief
- 7,667
- 11
- 0
Okay. I may have to eat my words a little, but I feel this illustrates even further the need for 100% ALS, even IFT wise, BUT.
Today on a clinical we had a patient brought in for pulmonary edema. The patient has a pulse of 103, temp of 101.2, rales in all fields, AMS, lethargy.
The patient came from a nursing home RIGHT next to the hospital. Literally a two minute drive and half of that is due to the fact you have to make a U-turn. The patient was brought in by an IFT company.
Initially the patient had a BLS response for "chest congestion" to that patient, the BLS crew assessed the patient and turned down the call for one fo their ALS units to come and pick the patient up. The ALS unit will take about an hour. The nursing home wouldn't call 911. Per nursing home staff's relay to the ALS unit, confirmed by the family, the BLS unit wouldn't take the patient because they didn't want to look like an idiot from bringing in an ALS patient on a BLS truck.
Now. Keep in mind the nursing home is two minutes away from the ER.
Upon arrival this patient was put intubated and put on a vent.
The doctor was furious. Actually called up the company.
Now for all you nurses and RRTs, med students, all you hospital folk, would you prefer a BLS crew recognize the need for definitive care over field intervention and get the patient to the hospital? Would you think less of the crew for transporting?
EMT's, would you have called for ALS and left or transported stat?
I was disappointed while discussing it with fellow students that most would have waited for the ALS unit. One said he didn't want to lose his license. Can you lose your license for a situation like this, transporting an ALS patient BLS?
Today on a clinical we had a patient brought in for pulmonary edema. The patient has a pulse of 103, temp of 101.2, rales in all fields, AMS, lethargy.
The patient came from a nursing home RIGHT next to the hospital. Literally a two minute drive and half of that is due to the fact you have to make a U-turn. The patient was brought in by an IFT company.
Initially the patient had a BLS response for "chest congestion" to that patient, the BLS crew assessed the patient and turned down the call for one fo their ALS units to come and pick the patient up. The ALS unit will take about an hour. The nursing home wouldn't call 911. Per nursing home staff's relay to the ALS unit, confirmed by the family, the BLS unit wouldn't take the patient because they didn't want to look like an idiot from bringing in an ALS patient on a BLS truck.
Now. Keep in mind the nursing home is two minutes away from the ER.
Upon arrival this patient was put intubated and put on a vent.
The doctor was furious. Actually called up the company.
Now for all you nurses and RRTs, med students, all you hospital folk, would you prefer a BLS crew recognize the need for definitive care over field intervention and get the patient to the hospital? Would you think less of the crew for transporting?
EMT's, would you have called for ALS and left or transported stat?
I was disappointed while discussing it with fellow students that most would have waited for the ALS unit. One said he didn't want to lose his license. Can you lose your license for a situation like this, transporting an ALS patient BLS?